107
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by PeleSpirit@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
all 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Ashyr@sh.itjust.works 50 points 10 months ago

It may feel like he's still getting away without consequence, but this is potentially the capstone experience for his entire life. Endless courtrooms, convictions and contempt.

It warms me to think how bad a year he's having. Here's to hoping next year is even worse for him.

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 26 points 10 months ago

He'll have to go to trial for at least two of them, so that's going to be fun!

We can only hope the stress kills him.

[-] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 10 months ago
[-] 800XL@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

And he loses control of his bowels and very audibly shits himself live.

[-] ElBarto@sh.itjust.works 6 points 10 months ago

So when Giuliani did it, it was a mic test.

[-] 800XL@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

The best part is that if the stress killed him the court room and he shit himself after death he'd have no idea the last thing everyone watching saw him do was something natural that he had no control over and if it happened while he was alive his ego would have to lie about it even if he knew everyone saw it happen.

There is just something wonderful about that.

[-] morphballganon@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

He's not having a bad time.

He just plays up the "unfair" angle to keep the donations rolling in.

He lives like a multi-millionaire.

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

Read what he's been saying. Look at it over a span of 5-years or so.

The man is sinking deeper and deeper into dementia, fear and paranoia. He is hardly having so much as a neutral time. He's in hell, and I'm here for it.

But please, no one think these things make him and his cultists harmless. We have to overwhelmingly vote him down or be prepared to defend ourselves.

[-] APassenger@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

Both, I think. He lost in Nov and triggered an uprising in Jan.

I think it's kinda both.

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago
[-] Gazumi@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago

Unless he gets prison time, he's going to continue to live his filthy entitled role and life. What I'm holding out for is him having a huge coronary event

[-] nomecks@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

He's dragging his children down with him

[-] Gazumi@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

He has no children. Just created beings with the purpose of underpinning his megalomaniac intent

[-] spaceghoti@lemmy.one 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

This trial is to assess what damages he'll have to pay for fraud. Prison time isn't an option, as I understand it. But it will likely end his business empire, and that's not a bad thing. He could end up losing Mar-A-Lago.

This is an even bigger threat to his ego than prison.

this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2023
107 points (95.7% liked)

politics

19090 readers
4347 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS