129
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

NEW YORK (AP) — Most business economists think the U.S. economy could avoid a recession next year, even if the job market ends up weakening under the weight of high interest rates, according to a survey released Monday.

Only 24% of economists surveyed by the National Association for Business Economics said they see a recession in 2024 as more likely than not. The 38 surveyed economists come from such organizations as Morgan Stanley, the University of Arkansas and Nationwide.

Such predictions imply the belief that the Federal Reserve can pull off the delicate balancing act of slowing the economy just enough through high interest rates to get inflation under control, without snuffing out its growth completely.

High rates work to slow inflation by making borrowing more expensive and hurting prices for stocks and other investments. The combination typically slows spending and starves inflation of its fuel. So far, the job market has remained remarkably solid despite high interest rates, and the unemployment rate sat at a low 3.9% in October.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] SuiXi3D@kbin.social 28 points 1 year ago

Does this mean rent will get easier to pay, or am I still boned?

[-] MicroWave@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago

Well, according to the article:

Of course, economists are only expecting price increases to slow, not to reverse, which is what it would take for prices for groceries, haircuts and other things to return to where they were before inflation took off during 2021.

[-] RememberTheApollo@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

Well, fuck.

And of course wages aren’t going to take a leap forward either.

[-] Ranvier@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Wages are growing on average, and faster than inflation (5.2% wage growth vs 3.2% inflation year over year for the past year). Takes two seconds to Google.

https://www.statista.com/statistics/1351276/wage-growth-vs-inflation-us/

Somewhat remarkably considering the problems with income inequality in the US, wages are growing the fastest of all among people with lower incomes (though all the wage increases in the world aren't gonna tackle the problem of the power of the 0.1% investor class of wealth hoarders).

https://www.epi.org/publication/swa-wages-2022/

https://www.marketplace.org/2023/03/08/lower-income-earners-wages-have-grown-faster-than-others/

It's pretty expected to given the persistent low unemployment and a high labor demand.

Not saying there's no concerns at all in the entire economy or anything crazy. But you don't have to spread disinformation like wages aren't growing.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (25 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

Every economists was predicting recession a few months back. They have an accuracy rate less than horoscopes

[-] wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one 9 points 1 year ago

Tbf, the act of predicting a recession can change the outcome, since the economy is just people reacting to things with money.

If everyone is expecting their houses to fall down from thin walls, so they start adding panels to their walls, suddenly the newly sturdy walls arent falling down anymore.

load more comments (14 replies)
[-] EatATaco@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

This isn't even remotely true, why is it being upvoted?

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Maybe because it is true and no one wants to hear government economists bullshit about how everything is fine when everything is not fucking fine.

So sick of economist lying crap. Telling us we can't have universal healthcare and we can't get rid of student loan debt but we have to give free money to banks and trade with countries that have slavery.

[-] EatATaco@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

But it's simply untrue.

Here is goldman sachs saying, over a year ago, that a path to a soft landing is hard but feasible. Here is an economist, from over a year ago, predicting that the chance of a soft landing was going up. Here are 3 economists writing for the Harvard business reviewing saying, back in Februrary, that the chances of a soft landing were good and calls for a recession were premature.

The whole point of the fed's policy on the rates was to tamp down on inflation while at the same time avoiding a recession. They are, of course, economists. At this point we look like we have good odds to pull of what they were intending to pull off.

I don't know where you get your information from, but if you thought no one thought was predicting a soft landing until a few months ago, well it's safe to say you don't really pay much attention to these things because plenty of economists have been predicting it likely, or going to happen, even for a long time. I've only heard a handful of economists even come close to virtually assuring a recession.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It should be clearly stated that recession is a technical term with a specific meaning, not a general term for a rough economy. Not all tough economic times are recessions. It is not at all a contradiction for lots of people to be struggling and for a recession to not be happening. This is not economists saying that everything is hunky dory and that people have no reason to complain, only that the specific phenomenon that is a recession is not occurring right now.

Edit: Just to put it explicitly, a recession is generally defined as two or more successive quarters in which GDP contracts rather than growing.

[-] eek2121@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

I am unemployed and have been for many months. I have never had issues finding a job, but finding one lately has been impossible. I know of 3 others in the same boat as I. I think that a recession is inevitable at this point. Lucky for me, I have other sources of income. I did have to drastically cut back spending, however.

[-] spyd3r@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

There is definitely something going on lately. I'm always looking for better jobs on indeed, professional recruiting services etc, trying to improve my situation.

In the last 4 months its been seemingly impossible to even get a response, and I know I'm more than qualified for these positions I'm applying to, and I've never had an issue before, even during severe economic downturns.

[-] eek2121@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] agitatedpotato@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Here's my gripe with economists. Even if this wasn't true, wouldn't be in the best interest of the economy to lie about it so the market doesn't get spooked and end up doing things that would make inflation worse?

What other 'science' has that nifty feature in it?

[-] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

You can make money on the economy going up or down, so there's generally economists predicting both. There's also a lot of economists that love to be the one to predict a recession, so they pretty much always predict one.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Regular medical science, it is called the placebo effect. It only works a bit. Not like you are going to regrow a limb, more like if you had a 40% of getting better on your own you now have a 50%.

Truth is economists can't predict shit and recessions happen based on numbers not based on feelings. We can't click our heels together and wish our way to a better world.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Wilzax@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Economists predict that now that the rich and ruling class have had a chance to get even rocher even faster, the rest of us will be allowed to catch our breaths just long enough to avoid sweeping reforms and revolutions the next time they pull this bullshit!

[-] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

They found the sweet spot between oops we broke it again and these poor people seem to be actually accumulating savings

[-] piecat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Nah we've just become too dependent

[-] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago

Wow we went through nearly 3 years of recession start tomorrow and now it's not even going to happen. Even weather reporters are better.

[-] BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Plenty of economists have been saying that avoiding a significant recession has been entirely possible. A recession is generally defined by at least two successive quarters of GDP decline, and while this did technically happen in 2022, the second quarter was only -0.6%, and the following quarter was back up to +2.7%.

It really needs to be stressed that not all bad economic circumstances are recessions. That's a very specific thing.

load more comments (15 replies)
[-] wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one 4 points 1 year ago

Weather doesnt read the weather report and change itself in response.

People read economics reports and spend differently in response.

Start giving the northern wind a newspaper, and you will see the weather report falter.

The poor and middle class are sowing, the rich are reaping

[-] Restaldt@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Just in time for a tumultuous election

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2023
129 points (96.4% liked)

News

23424 readers
1793 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS