39
submitted 11 months ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] spacecowboy@sh.itjust.works 7 points 11 months ago

Every citizen on earth should sue these fucks. YOU CAUSED THIS

[-] federalreverse@feddit.de 5 points 11 months ago

To be honest, I don't really get why there needs to be a fund to support gas/oil companies in finding methane leaks and stopping flaring. These companies are effectively burning/emitting some of their own potential profits. I find it hard to believe that national gas/oil companies would be so cash-starved that they couldn't finance a straightforward way to secure additional profits from existing sites. Am I missing something?

[-] activistPnk@slrpnk.net 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I have no doubt the bottom line is king to them, which surely must imply that the cost of plugging the leaks exceeds the value of the fuel they would recover.

What I don’t get is why they are not being forced to plug the leaks at their own cost. Seems to showcase that regulation is an embarrassment.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Muh prawfitz!!

[-] activistPnk@slrpnk.net 2 points 11 months ago

How did this post get an “archived copies” line? Is that something you added manually?

Note that the Ghostarchive link is good. It’s Cloudflare-free, open to all, and even better than the original link. So I don’t even see the value in giving the original link which has blocking mechanisms. OTOH, Archive.is is terrible. Cloudflare and tor-hostile, thus a walled-garden itself.

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 2 points 11 months ago

I added it manually. I do that for posts where I don't have a paywall-bypassing gift link.

Archive.is is terrible in terms of privacy, but does a better job of collecting the site without pop-overs and without losing images and such

[-] activistPnk@slrpnk.net 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Good idea.

I have images disabled in my browser so I suppose that’s why I found Ghostarchive better.

[-] activistPnk@slrpnk.net 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

BBC radio just reported that ExxonMobil has had such high profits since the pandemic that it’s now suspected of being a key contributor to the current global inflation crisis (“greedflation”). WTF. This makes it even more despicable that Chevron and Exxon opt out of funding methane reduction.

Exxon, Chevron, and Kraft Heinz are notorious scumbags who I’ve been boycotting for over a decade. Everyone should be boycotting these companies.

[-] activistPnk@slrpnk.net 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

The initiative secured $25 million each from six oil companies: BP Plc, Eni SpA, Equinor ASA, Occidental Petroleum Corp., Shell Plc and TotalEnergies SE. Some countries also ponied up, with the United Arab Emirates that is hosting COP28 providing $100 million; the US, $2 million; Germany, $1.5 million; and Norway, $1 million.

No mention of #Adnoc? Isn’t there a bit of a scandal with Sultan Al Jabar being part of COP28 while being the CEO of Adnoc?

BTW, indeed that list of oil companies seems to be a lesser of evils AFAICT, apart perhaps from Shell who Greenpeace really picks on for some reason (maybe the spills?)

The greatest of evils should of course be boycotted. There is no reason you have to buy fuel from:

  • Chevron (an ALEC member who was caught financing the cloakroom project to conceal meetings between US republicans and giant corps)
  • Exxon/Mobil who discovered climate change and concealed it (#ExxonKnew)

The best action is to stop driving a personal car. But if you don’t think you can (yes you can; #fuckCars), the least you can do is boycott #Chevron and #ExxonMobile.

this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2023
39 points (100.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5237 readers
287 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS