Since it already worked with instagram, this was people signing in with their instagram account, checking the app once or twice, and then going back to instagram. The starting numbers where incredibly manipulated because of this single account system between threads and instagram.

Good I love to see Facebook projects fail

It's a worse Mastodon, run by a company that celebrated election misinformation, leading to the storming of the Capitol, and who later helped police arrest a woman for abortion by turning over private messages she sent to another party. I hope it fails.

I mean if you pay attention most social media inundated with influencers and companies is basically:

"Buy this, no buy this, buy this instead, spend your money here!" It even leeches into everyday conversations outside of social media.

Pay attention to how often people talk about buying things and newly released products. Hell, I've caught myself contributing to it. It's kind of gross when you realize how steeped in consumerism nearly everything has become.

Not sure why anyone wanted a second twitter that’s still made by a big-tech

That's good news. First it was 50% and now 80%. How bout meta loses 100% of its users.

damn, reading the data collected from the Play Store made me finally delete my instagram account. the damn app is a free farm of data. fuck zuck

This is the best summary I could come up with:

Similarweb, a digital intelligence platform, shared its data with Gizmodo showing Threads daily active users hovered around 49 million just two days after launch.

David Carr, a senior insights manager at the analysis company, told us the engagement time based on just U.S. user data was slightly more favorable to Threads, but not by much.

Back during its 15 minutes of fame, Threads was leveraged as the fastest-growing platform in the history of apps, hitting 100 million user signups less than a week after launch.

Instagram head Amad Mosseri has also mentioned their intent to connect Threads to the decentralized Fediverse, though whether that drives new-found interest in the app is anyone’s guess.

It was clear from Thread’s launch that users were desperate for a Twitter alternative away from owner Elon Musk’s unending march toward making the platform a pay-to-play hellscape.

A big problem with the app was that it simply didn’t include features found in its main competitors, and the company spent years playing catch up, but all in vain.

I'm a bot and I'm open source!

Good, hopefully it keeps tanking so we don't have to pay any further mind to it.

This is what happens when you launch with no content discovery features, so you have to whore yourself out and follow anyone and everyone if you want to get any attention. "Content creators" and clout chasers are the primary customer of this service, so without that I don't know why they'd want to use it.

A lot of people tried it out the first few days. Didn't found the function they need and left.

Probably a lot will go back if its fully functional. Honestly cannot believe a Twitter alternative did not launch with chronological feed....

Ive been hearing the same headline for two weeks now

I like how they made the logo look like it says “ADS” throughout.

Turns out, the brands and the ads weren't the reason people were sticking to Twitter.

It's just companies and influencers, nobody else is posting much there. And half of the influencers are only there to try to get you to follow them somewhere else. (feed is absolutely crammed with Taylor "not wearing a mask outdoors in 2023 is literally genocide" Lorenz hawking her new YouTube channel and I don't even follow her)

Meanwhile Mastodon continues growing steadily, and I'm getting as much engagement there as I ever did on Twitter with maybe 10% as many followers.

Honestly not that big of a deal. When something is hyped up users who either didn't or barely used Twitter (X) probably joined in. It boosted their initial numbers but again they fell off. They'll grow as unique content grows. That happens with everything, as will the case be with Lemmy. Growth isn't linear.

This looks like a hype cycle pattern, and they are entering the trough of disillusionment phase.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gartner_hype_cycle

And here I am... I've never even tried it.

Sounds like Threads has lost the thread...

I'll see myself out.

Good. I've managed to block tiktok and all meta services from my network.

I think there will be more activity once they add more features. It’s very bare-bones right now. I honestly like the app, though, all things considered. I hate Facebook/Meta, but it’s been a nice app to just scroll through, and there’s been enough content to use it as a time killer. They desperately need a proper search feature and a trending page, though, especially if they ever hope to fully replace Twitter. Overall, I like it more than both Mastodon and Bluesky, because discoverability is so awful on Mastodon and Bluesky doesn’t have enough users and content because they haven’t gone public yet. And I very much like the idea and structure of Mastodon much more (with it being open source and federated), but the user experience has been so bad for me, with discoverability being the worst aspect of it.

10 million DAU's is still pretty impressive

They should have implemented activity pub support from day 1. They rushed the roll out because they wanted to make us of Twitter's (one of many) fuck ups but failed to keep users.

Because it's so boring. It doesn't have a "trending" tab and every post is an ad.

@autotldr@lemmings.world

They could have picked a better name. Took me a while to figure out that https://threads.com/ isn't the right app. Visiting https://www.threads.net/ wasn't exactly enlightening either.