272
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] spaghetti_carbanana@krabb.org 50 points 11 months ago

Makes me wonder if anyone out there is maintaining a list of (I can’t believe I’m about to say this) privacy-respecting cars

[-] big_slap@lemmy.world 45 points 11 months ago
[-] notfromhere@lemmy.one 14 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I honestly do not understand their rating system. Every one of them looks to have exactly the same rating (Mozilla says 👎, People voted super creepy), but then they have a sort by least or most creepy. What gives?

Edit: nevermind looks like there are some that are “very creepy”. This rating system is kind of obtuse.

[-] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 24 points 11 months ago

Because they are all creepy, and not one of those companies give a damn about privacy or security...and why should they? Companies can't get in trouble for anything ever...

[-] EmergMemeHologram@startrek.website 15 points 11 months ago

I love the idea but hate how Mozilla did this

[-] sir_reginald@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago

yeah the rating system is poorly executed. the articles on the other hand are quite a good read.

[-] mreiner@beehaw.org 12 points 11 months ago

Mozilla’s “least to most creepy” ranking is the best resource I’ve found so far:

https://foundation.mozilla.org/en/privacynotincluded/categories/cars/

[-] sic_semper_tyrannis@feddit.ch 6 points 11 months ago

I would think most cars before 2010 should be okay. Infotainment was pretty rudimentary at that point

[-] stellargmite@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

Infotainment? Do you mean adverdataharvestment?

[-] sic_semper_tyrannis@feddit.ch 4 points 11 months ago

Yeah, that's pretty accurate

[-] ItsComplicated@sh.itjust.works 25 points 11 months ago

I prefer my car just be a car! I am definitely getting old.

[-] MasterBuilder@lemmy.one 8 points 11 months ago

No, you aren't. You just haven't been conditioned your whole life to accept 100% surveillance.

[-] ThatRocco@lemmy.world 21 points 11 months ago

When I went to trade school in 2010 for automotive repair our instructors told us this was going to happen. At the time, I thought they were just grumpy old men who didn't like that cars were becoming more and more electronic. How wrong I was

[-] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 15 points 11 months ago

I want to thank the Automakers for giving me more reasons to ride a bike! 🤗 🤗

[-] rebul@kbin.social 12 points 11 months ago

Typical Washington bluster for optics. Auto manufacturers and their unions contribute too much money to politicians, nothing will be done.

[-] carnimoss@lemmings.world 10 points 11 months ago

Are there any modern cars without this problem? It makes sense that they steal data considering how many have wifi and bluetooth

[-] speaker_hat@lemmy.one 1 points 11 months ago

I guess only the ones without Internet connection

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 3 points 11 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


And like many technologically engaged Ars Technica readers, he does not like what he sees in terms of automakers' approach to data privacy.

On Friday, Sen. Markey wrote to 14 car companies with a variety of questions about data privacy policies, urging them to do better.

The problems were widespread—most automakers collect too much personal data and are too eager to sell or share it with third parties, the foundation found.

Markey noted the Mozilla Foundation report in his letters, which were sent to BMW, Ford, General Motors, Honda, Hyundai, Kia, Mazda, Mercedes-Benz, Nissan, Stellantis, Subaru, Tesla, Toyota, and Volkswagen.

The senator is concerned about the large amounts of data that modern cars can collect, including the troubling potential to use biometric data (like the rate a driver blinks and breathes, as well as their pulse) to infer mood or mental health.

"Although certain data collection and sharing practices may have real benefits, consumers should not be subject to a massive data collection apparatus, with any disclosures hidden in pages-long privacy policies filled with legalese.


The original article contains 282 words, the summary contains 175 words. Saved 38%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2023
272 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy Guides

16263 readers
4 users here now

In the digital age, protecting your personal information might seem like an impossible task. We’re here to help.

This is a community for sharing news about privacy, posting information about cool privacy tools and services, and getting advice about your privacy journey.


You can subscribe to this community from any Kbin or Lemmy instance:

Learn more...


Check out our website at privacyguides.org before asking your questions here. We've tried answering the common questions and recommendations there!

Want to get involved? The website is open-source on GitHub, and your help would be appreciated!


This community is the "official" Privacy Guides community on Lemmy, which can be verified here. Other "Privacy Guides" communities on other Lemmy servers are not moderated by this team or associated with the website.


Moderation Rules:

  1. We prefer posting about open-source software whenever possible.
  2. This is not the place for self-promotion if you are not listed on privacyguides.org. If you want to be listed, make a suggestion on our forum first.
  3. No soliciting engagement: Don't ask for upvotes, follows, etc.
  4. Surveys, Fundraising, and Petitions must be pre-approved by the mod team.
  5. Be civil, no violence, hate speech. Assume people here are posting in good faith.
  6. Don't repost topics which have already been covered here.
  7. News posts must be related to privacy and security, and your post title must match the article headline exactly. Do not editorialize titles, you can post your opinions in the post body or a comment.
  8. Memes/images/video posts that could be summarized as text explanations should not be posted. Infographics and conference talks from reputable sources are acceptable.
  9. No help vampires: This is not a tech support subreddit, don't abuse our community's willingness to help. Questions related to privacy, security or privacy/security related software and their configurations are acceptable.
  10. No misinformation: Extraordinary claims must be matched with evidence.
  11. Do not post about VPNs or cryptocurrencies which are not listed on privacyguides.org. See Rule 2 for info on adding new recommendations to the website.
  12. General guides or software lists are not permitted. Original sources and research about specific topics are allowed as long as they are high quality and factual. We are not providing a platform for poorly-vetted, out-of-date or conflicting recommendations.

Additional Resources:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS