14
submitted 11 months ago by livus@kbin.social to c/movies@lemmy.world

Last November we had the opportunity to attend an exclusive twenty-minute screening of ‘Dune: Part II’, the highly anticipated second installment of the monumental adaptation of Frank Herbert’s science fiction classic that Denis Villeneuve is carrying out. Of course, it is early to give an opinion, but we can assure that there are reasons to think that This new installment could be even more stimulating than the first. We tell you why.

Via !movies@kbin.social

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] MeanEYE@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

When it comes to Hollywood expecting anything is a mistake, other than pandering. That one is a given these days.

[-] mhague@lemmy.world -2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I've only seen Frank Herbert's Dune but I thought the new one was too quickly paced and consequently boring. It needed to be slowed down and allow the world of Dune to fully seep. There's no chance that part two will fix this.

[-] dustyData@lemmy.world 25 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

My friend, it lasts two and a half hours and barely covers the first third of the first book. If it were any slower it would just be hours of shots of a rock being eroded by wind.

[-] BruceCampbellschin@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

And they would call that, "The Making of (a) Dune".

I'll see myself out.

[-] ours@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

If Villeneuve is still the director, I would be watching it anyway.

[-] Beetschnapps@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Yea but it could have hit 3 hours if they had written in Legolas.

[-] livus@kbin.social 3 points 11 months ago

@dustyData

hours of shots of a rock being eroded by wind.

Ssssh don't give them any ideas for the third installment.

[-] mhague@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

I wouldn't mind some 'uncomfortably long' shots of rocks or something after the more storyful scenes. Like a 20 minute segment with no dialogue. We don't get enough of that.

Would go great in a spiritual scifi whose protagonist is a planet.

[-] livus@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago

Yeah it's time the Slow Cinema movement turned its eye towards sci fi. :D

[-] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

Really? I mean it basically hit only half the story beats that Frank Herbert's Dune did, and it was longer.

Most people I know who complained about it complained about it being too slow at times and consequently boring. Not too fast. I personally thought it was fantastic, and I'm really looking forward to the second part.

[-] livus@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

@mhague I had the opposite problem, I felt like the pacing was off because it drags in the second act. I still want to see part 2 though.

[-] mhague@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I want to see the second too, the first's visuals were interesting and even if I wanted it to be 3 hrs long it's still more Dune.

[-] livus@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago

@mhague yeah it was spectacular to look at and I felt it was just getting interesting.

this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2023
14 points (79.2% liked)

Movies

7438 readers
69 users here now

Lemmy

Welcome to Movies, a community for discussing movies, film news, box office, and more! We want this to be a place for members to feel safe to discuss and share everything they love about movies and movie related things. Please feel free to take part and help our community grow!


Related Communities:

!books@lemmy.world - Discussing books and book-related things.

!comicbooks@lemmy.world - A place to discuss comic books of all types.

!marvelstudios@lemmy.world - LW's home for all things MCU.


While posting and commenting in this community, you must abide by the Lemmy.World Terms of Service: https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

  1. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, or advocating violence will be removed.

  2. Be civil: disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally insult others.

  3. Spam, self promotion, trolling, and bots are not allowed

  4. Shitposts and memes are allowed until they prove to be a problem.

    Regarding spoilers; Please put "(Spoilers)" in the title of your post if you anticipate spoilers, as we do not currently have a spoiler tag available. If your post contains an image that could be considered a spoiler, please mark the thread as NSFW so the image gets blurred. As far as how long to wait until the post is no longer a spoiler, please just use your best judgement. Everyone has a different idea on this, so we don't want to make any hard limits.

    Please use spoiler tags whenever commenting a spoiler in a non-spoiler thread. Most of the Lemmy clients don't support this but we want to get into the habit as clients will be supporting in the future.

Failure to follow these guidelines will result in your post/comment being removed and/or more severe actions. All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. We ask that the users report any comment or post that violates the rules, and to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS