German city hit by massive hail storm (www.bbc.com)

submitted 1 year ago by CantSt0pPoppin@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

12 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The storms were so intense that half-a-metre-high piles of hailstones formed in some places.

Intense storms in southern and western Germany saw hailstones pile up to half a metre high.

So much hail fell in the village of Weiler, in Bavaria, over such a short period of time that some roads were entirely blocked with ice.

Many streets, squares and even gardens were briefly transformed into winter landscapes by the heavy hailstorms.

Trees were uprooted and the fire brigade had to go out to pump out flooded cellars during the storms.

top 7 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[+] BobKerman3999@feddit.it 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

[deleted]

[-] febra@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is one of the worst takes on Germany's energy market.

The decision to close the three NPPs everyone seems to talk about was taken over ten years ago. The operators of said NPPs were already preparing for closure and haven't invested anything for a future certification process. The preparation for the certification process would take years to complete and an astronomical amount of money (because making up for half a decade of neglect actually costs a lot, and the costs are going up exponentially by each year). And only then they could go for the certification process, without any guarantees that they would even run for another twenty years. We're talking about old reactors here. You can't simply just pop up out of nowhere and demand these operators to run their reactors for one more decade when they've been preparing for closure all these years without any kind of investments in maintenance/repairs to sustain future prolonged operations.

Building new reactors takes at least ten years. And billions over billions in funding. These are huge infrastructure projects. And we all know how huge infrastructure projects tend to usually go way over budget and stretch their timeline by at least half a decade. In the same time you can build renewables with triple the capacity and a third of the price. AND they are decentralized and don't even need highly educated operators to run. And.. don't produce waste that needs storing for thousands of years. And they're cheaper.

Don't get me wrong, I'm all for small, modularised nuclear reactors, but this NPP mentality straight out of the 60s is no longer going to cut it in the future. France, while producing the vast majority of their energy using NPPs has been importing energy from Germany every summer for two/three years in a row now. Their NPPs are either too old and need constant maintenance and repairs, or the water levels in their rivers are too low (because of climate change/droughts) to provide cooling for the reactors so they need to shut them down, or the disastruous privatization they went through with their energy infrastructure that they had to reverse it (lol), and so on, thus they've been dependant on the German energy market everyone seems to criticize so much. Other countries aren't even doing much better.

I'm all against the coal power plants, and Germany is in a bit of a pickle, but everyone seems to think that nuclear is this magic silver bullet here that could've saved Germany. People seem to imply that everyone in Germany took this decision without even looking at the numbers and that they're the enlightened ones. Germany has more than enough exprets in this field. The numbers simply do not support large NPPs at this point.

[-] dmrzl@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

With a lack of water being our main concern for the near future even small NPP are completely ridiculous. Just ask the French...

[-] CeruleanRuin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

In theory I agree with the sentiment, but then I imagine the same people who're supposed to be keeping oil pipelines from rupturing put in charge of nuclear materials.

load more comments

this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2023

67 points (97.2% liked)

World News

38955 readers

1661 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.