“AI” Hurts Consumers and Workers -- and Isn’t Intelligent (techpolicy.press)

submitted 1 year ago by stopthatgirl7@kbin.social to c/technology@lemmy.world

13 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Researchers Alex Hanna and Emily M. Bender call on businesses not to succumb to this artificial “intelligence” hype.

top 12 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] HurlingDurling@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago

I've never been scared for AI, I've been scared of the idiots who THINK it's smart (smarter than them at least) and want to push ot to their employees and customers. My employer has been pushing more and more automation using AI for development that if it can make sense of the codebase our customers have, then I will happily retire and let it take the madness that is their codebases.

[-] Mark_is_on_his_droid@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

I believe in it as a work accelerator, as it helps me think through problems in areas I know well and can sort it's bullshit out. Editing is faster than writing, and I frequently make typos in content I draft from scratch. ChatGPT has been a godsend for me professionally.

[-] Haha@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago

This

[-] Ultra980@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don't understand why people say "this" instead of upvoting.

[-] Haha@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

upvote but with words. also gives validation and opens up to conversation. some people value written testimony more than the upvote.

[-] Geek_King@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Sure, ChatGPT isn't actually intelligent, but it's a good approximation. You can ask ChatGPT a technical question, give it a ton of context to the question, and it'll "understand" all the information you've given it and answer your question. That's much more akin to asking an expert human who takes in the info, understands and answers, vs trying to find the answer via a search engine.

For me and other people in my life, ChatGPT has been intensely helpful job wise. I do double check any info it gives, but generally it's been pretty solid.

[-] magic_lobster_party@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

ChatGPT and other LLMs are ideal for cases where 100% accuracy is not required. If you’re ok with getting wrong answers 80-90% of the time, then you have a legitimate use case for LLMs.

[-] Geek_King@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

In terms of technical questions, especially older Microsoft related stuff, it does very well. My experience hasn't been any where near 80-90% wrong answers. It all depends on the topics you're asking about I suppose.

[-] gapbetweenus@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

Just like humans.

[-] Haha@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Who’s butthurt? Which billionaire is crying?

[-] atticus88th@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

The only people butthurt are politicians, journalists and artists that essentially copy and paste shit.

Basically all the jobs that can be done by a trained monkey.

[-] Haha@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Let’s not insult the trained monkeys they had to work harder than any of them ever did :(

load more comments

this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2023

42 points (75.0% liked)

Technology

59259 readers

1558 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS