5

It barely fits in the bloody car park. So bad for pedestrians and the environment.

all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] MortyMcFry@aussie.zone 2 points 1 year ago

Oh god the reddit f150 posts have made it to lemmy. Didn’t take long

[-] R00bot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago

lmao my bad I just saw the article and couldn't believe the size of the thing.

[-] Sternhammer@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago

Your post certainly struck a nerve!

[-] 5redie8@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Hi American here - please don't let those things take over your roads, it sucks for all the reasons you think it does

[-] Dreadrat@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

But my masculinity

[-] Railison@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago

Can they be fined for not fitting inside the car park?

[-] shirro@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

For complete fairness to everyone we should tax every vehicle on road or path from scooters and bikes to b-doubles based on the 4th power of axle load to properly account for the impact on road maintenance costs. Then additional levies for disproportionate environmental costs and harm to vulnerable road users. Keep the overall tax amount the same but shift the burden so people with smaller vehicles pay substantially less than they do now. And then add strict liability for anything much larger than a kei car.

[-] ephemeral_gibbon@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago

Yes, however with that it'd be more expensive to administer taxation on bicycles etc. Than what they'd bring in... So not really worth doing at all.

[-] TassieTosser@aussie.zone 0 points 1 year ago

Since the amount of damage caused by bikes to infrastructure would be small, the govt could just slap a tax for the cost to the purchase price of every bike. Not saying I'd agree with it but there are ways to make all road users pay their share.

[-] itsmikeyd@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Surely human powered transport should have tax breaks in order to encourage adoption by promoting affordability though.

[-] Viper_NZ@lemmy.nz 1 points 1 year ago

But now that Holden have stopped making Commodores, how else are you meant to show you’re a dickhead?

[-] bkmps3@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago

They’re every inconvenience rolled in to one. A pain to get in. A pain to park. Use heaps of fuel. Don’t fit in garages, and to top it off are expensive AF. I’m confident in saying unless you tow like, horse floats on the regular, if you own one you’re a fucking idiot.

[-] bandario@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They're not actually that bad on fuel. Don't get me wrong, I'd never own one but a few of our major players at work have them as some sort of status symbol. Cruising in overdrive at 100km/h they can go as low as 6L/100km, but average is around 12L/100km unless you are doing lots of hunting through the gearbox or driving like a dick, then you can see some truly disturbing fuel usage figures.

To put it in perspective, this is on par with a modern hilux, and WORLDS better than the 2022 79 series landcruiser even with all the fuel efficiency gains they made.

To be clear I still don't think anyone should be driving one here - our roads and car parks are simply not built for them. They aren't that great offroad either. Really the only genuine use case is towing an enormous caravan down the hwy, in which case I hate you anyway because that's TWO symbols of you being an inconsiderate prick that doesn't care about anyone else.

[-] Zagorath@aussie.zone 0 points 1 year ago

They're also way more dangerous. They do more damage if they hit something, and because of the terrible visibility they're more likely to hit something.

That said, if they do hit something, the people inside the tank might be ok.

[-] R00bot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 year ago

They are more likely to roll than normal cars (SUVs excluded), and when they roll they're generally more likely to crush the roof due to their weight. So yeah, while they're better off than the car they hit, they're still not amazing safety wise.

[-] Recant@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

While true on the more likely to roll due to their higher center of gravity, unless they are lowered after purchased, I was surprised to find that at least for the f150, the roof strength is almost 6 times the weight of the truck.

That's according to the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety which is an independent review organization that gave the f150 one of its highest ratings.

More information is here: https://www.iihs.org/ratings/vehicle/ford/f-150-crew-cab-pickup/2021

[-] R00bot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 months ago

I knew the f150 had a good safety rating but didn't know the roof was that strong. Thanks for sharing.

this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2023
5 points (100.0% liked)

Australia

3579 readers
106 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS