155
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/politics@lemmy.world

The last time around, Trump’s efforts to pack the Defense Department with cranks and flunkies came too late to bring the military under his full political control. The president and his advisers were slow-footed and disorganized, and lacked familiarity with Washington politics. They were hindered as well by the courage and professionalism of the military officers and civilian appointees who, side by side, serve in the Defense Department.

... In a second term, Trump would combine his instincts for revenge and self-protection. He would seek not only to get even with an officer corps that he thinks betrayed him, but also to break the military as one of the few institutions able to constrain his attempts to act against the Constitution and the rule of law.

top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] AlfredEinstein@lemmy.world 44 points 11 months ago

Isn't it pretty well understood that the reason Senator Tubberville was holding up all those military promotions was to keep the slots open for Trump loyalists.

He's still holding the top General slots open for just that reason.

[-] TechyDad@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago

He's still holding up a lot of other spots by holding those top general slots as well. For the lower promotions to go through, they need the people moving into their top general slots to vacate their positions. And for the even lower ones, they need the lower ones to move up.

Tuberville essentially said that he's not going to hold up the entire line of people, just a few at the head of the line. But holding up the head of the line means the rest of the line is impacted.

[-] Cruxifux@lemmy.world 41 points 11 months ago

It’s really a sad day when I have to choose to side with the American military as the lesser of two evils.

The world is fucked and it’s largely due to American elites and the military they controls interests.

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 21 points 11 months ago

Who could have guessed allowing private interests a large say in our government would have ended up this way?

[-] MindSkipperBro12@lemmy.world 17 points 11 months ago

Just be thankful that the military has always been known as very apolitical in US history. With how this boat keeps rocking, though, I hope it stays that way.

[-] cmbabul@lemmy.world 24 points 11 months ago

I’m worried we’re gonna be some level of politically fucked no matter what but I’m 100% sure that if Trump wins or is handed the election like W in 2000 the United States will cease to exist not only as we know it but potentially as an entity altogether. It will be civil war, because as fucked up as our system is there are still decent people in positions of power to resist what he tries to do and he will send the military in to enforce.

That’s already a civil war to me but when citizens resist and there’s mutinies from any percentage of soldiers that refuse to fire on their countrymen it will become a full conflict and that will cascade one way or the other to the rest of the country. Maybe not every city or county, but enough of them.

[-] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

he will send the military in to enforce.

Gonna be more than a few deserters. I don't think the president can even deploy federal troops stateside, and you better believe the national guard aren't going to shoot their neighbors.

[-] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 7 points 11 months ago

Not a local state's national guard. They will send in other states.

[-] cmbabul@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Probably but a very non insignificant percentage are gonna support him

[-] loopedcandle@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 11 months ago

Well we are kinda already talking about a guy that DGAF about the rule of law. However, I think this is what you're looking for: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posse_Comitatus_Act

[-] JustZ@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Trump and his team twice prepared memos and executive orders enacting posse comitatus against black lives matters protesters and to seize election equipment from municipal county and state governments.

Only a few adults in the room were able to stop us from going into effect. If he wins another term, those adults will not be in the room. They are planning to purge the government on day one and are already building lists of thousands of people who are potential loyalists to Trump.

It will truly be the end of American democracy and that is not hyperbole at all.

[-] treadful@lemmy.zip 3 points 11 months ago

My bet is a silent takeover with little resistance.

[-] Mostly_Gristle@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago

Of course it would be. Dictatorships aren't really possible in a country with a military that refuses to march against its own people.

[-] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

And a military that is willing to kill its own people has recently shown that it's pretty bad about going up against other armies.

[-] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

The republican traitor filth must be brought low.

[-] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 months ago

I hope there are stay behinds in case the military goes against the public, but I doubt ut

this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2023
155 points (97.5% liked)

politics

19097 readers
2945 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS