1372
submitted 10 months ago by spaduf@slrpnk.net to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 213 points 10 months ago

Everyone, stop staying "duh" to research outcomes. Research takes time to design, fund, run and analyze and it's purpose is to scientifically prove something we all "felt" a while ago.

Our feelings don't mean too much because they are often wrong, data backed fact means something. Start being happy about these validation posts and hold off on the pickachu face memes.

[-] Eximius@lemmy.world 56 points 10 months ago

While the defence for science is nice (wasn't attacked here), outrage is allowed on public discourse. I think most people are outraged for the lack of inaction of regulatory bodies at the sight of extreme price fixing when everyone and their mother had at least the gut feeling that it is all bullshit.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[-] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 171 points 10 months ago

I didn't need a study to tell you that. In my industry the costs of all my goods are up roughly 30% since 2020, but my margins have gotten thinner at the same time so my revenue somehow managed to magically remain exactly the same. And it's no coincidence, I'm sure, that the manufacturers are the ones who determine the Minimum Advertising Price I'm supposed to be selling at.

If that 30% number sounds awfully familiar, you'll find it in the linked article. So, profits for megacorporations rose 30%, and my costs rose 30%, too. Gee, will you look at that. Those two numbers are the same. That's a fuckin' puzzler, isn't it?

So some asshole somewhere in that supply chain pyramid is making a lot of money off of this "inflation" excuse, and it sure as hell isn't me.

[-] jonne@infosec.pub 87 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

It's because there hasn't been any meaningful anti trust enforcement for decades. Every industry is basically an oligopoly at this stage, so they can set whatever price they want, because they know their competitors will do the same (because they face the exact same pressures from the exact same shareholders to increase profits).

If it was a free market, you could've found a different supplier, but obviously there was no alternative, or you would've done just that.

[-] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 79 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Oligopolies that run both horizontally and vertically up the supply chain.

This is what happens after decades of mergers and acquisitions in the name of diversification, and corruption of regulators and governments — a small number of multinationals, owned by an even smaller number of oligarchs, reach a point of control where it is relatively easy to collude with the handful of others that collectively own 90% of every market and sector, and operate as a functional monopoly.

It's the OPEC-ification of the entire global economy. It is of no surprise that fossil fuel oligarchs applied that model to everything, nor that the governments they own continue to enable their crimes. We're all hostages to the economic terrorists of capitalism.

[-] Benjaben@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago

Great comment, sincerely - completely nails it. My only nitpick (and only delivered cuz you clearly care) is I don't think it should be called terrorism.

Terrorism, as hate-fueled and damaging as it is, at least has an ethos, an organizing principle, a (generally twisted, but coherent) morality. These monsters have nothing so human to stand behind. As you know, it's nothing more complicated than "fuck every life on earth but mine, for no reason more compelling than that I want even more stuff". Terrorists actually compare favorably against that.

[-] Restaldt@lemmy.world 23 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Lets call it cancer then

Growth to the detriment of literally everything around it

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] orrk@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago

free markets build monopolies, the only reason we are only at oligopoly is that we still have some regulation on the market (that inherently makes it not free btw)

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] notannpc@lemmy.world 91 points 10 months ago

Literally anyone with a functioning brain already knew this. And yet, there will be no penalty for this bullshit.

[-] spaduf@slrpnk.net 52 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Eh with how this conversation has been evolving lately I'd say this is the worst time to be pessimistic about the possibility of regulation. Is a good time to be loud and angry about it tho

[-] JackiesFridge@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago

I can be pessimistic AND loud & angry.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] orrk@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

no, be pessimistic, the optimistic stance is that hey will magically self regulate

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca 69 points 10 months ago

Oh no, this is such a shock. No shit they were lying about inflation. Those bastards were reporting record highs while the average Joe was struggling to pay rent.

load more comments (14 replies)
[-] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 62 points 10 months ago

Well they got told to knock it off nicely. So I guess they will lower prices now. 🙄

[-] AlfredEinstein@lemmy.world 28 points 10 months ago

The egg producers already have.

The "bird flu" was nowhere significant enough to cause the price spike on its own. It was an attempt to determine "what the market will allow". And it turns out people can do without eggs quite comfortably.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

They just went too far too fast and found out they aren't the staple they thought they were. They also didn't have enough market penetration when some stores had protected supply lines and did not raise their egg price.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ForestOrca@kbin.social 57 points 10 months ago

The beginnings of a list:
"The biggest perpetrators were energy companies like Shell, Exxon Mobil, and Chevron, which were able to enjoy massive profits last year"
If you can find any way to go electric, use petrol less, ride a bike, walk, use a train, avoid a plane, etc, go for it. Prolly the petrol corps won't notice your individual actions, but the carbon you'll keep out of the atmosphere might just help to keep our planet's ecosphere viable.

The Study itself: INFLATION, PROFITS AND MARKET POWER TOWARDS A NEW RESEARCH AND POLICY AGENDA - https://www.ippr.org/files/2023-12/1701878131_inflation-profits-and-market-power-dec-23.pdf - Jeebus, 32 pages!

[-] chitak166@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

but the carbon you’ll keep out of the atmosphere might just help to keep our planet’s ecosphere viable.

This is only if nations stop burning oil even if it's cheap.

Nations aren't going to stop burning oil until it's too expensive.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] mechoman444@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

I drive electric and in my home state of Georgia, USA they have an ad valorem tax of 239 dollars or there abouts for people that drive Evs and plug in hybrids.

My theory is that they're missing out on the taxes I would normally pay if I bought gas and need to recoup their losses.

[-] NABDad@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago

My theory is that they're missing out on the taxes I would normally pay if I bought gas and need to recoup their losses.

I don't think you need to refer to that as a theory. Taxes on fuel for motor vehicles go towards road maintenance. Vehicles that drive on the roads but don't burn gas or diesel, don't pay their share of the road maintenance costs. That's why states want to tax EVs.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] mechoman444@lemmy.world 44 points 10 months ago

They needed studies for that? Shoot they could have just asked me!

[-] lagomorphlecture@lemm.ee 17 points 10 months ago

Me after reading the headline, "duh?".

[-] SoleInvictus@lemmy.world 34 points 10 months ago

I'm biased because I'm a scientist, but verifying observations and assumptions through empirical methods is typically a good thing. A lot of people believe "common sense" things that are completely wrong, e.g., that lightning never strikes twice, evolution has some sort of goal in mind, to never go to bed angry, etc.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] masquenox@lemmy.world 40 points 10 months ago

Capitalists? Lying about literally everything?

Who coulda thunk it?

[-] s38b35M5@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago

But ...? But market forces! Free market! The public will decide! No? Oh well, let's do nothing and see if it changes for the better.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] foggy@lemmy.world 38 points 10 months ago

I want a well curated list of the worst offenders so I can figure out who to stop giving my money to.

[-] EatYouWell@lemmy.world 52 points 10 months ago

You will be surprised how difficult that plan is to implement. Pretty much everything is owned by a few mega corporations.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] bostonbananarama@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago
  1. Everyone. ---End of List.
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] the_q@lemmy.world 38 points 10 months ago

Duh. Finance bros will still tell you different though.

[-] Muffi@programming.dev 17 points 10 months ago

They will tell you it's because of the increase in wages, and then refuse to believe the data when you show them that wages have stagnated.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] EmperorHenry@discuss.tchncs.de 37 points 10 months ago

The title of this post might as well be "Water is wet, the sky is blue, ice is cold"

Of course corporations are lying to have a reason to raise prices when they don't need to.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Im14abeer@midwest.social 35 points 10 months ago

So you're telling me it doesn't cost twice as much to make and ship charcoal. It doesn't cost three times as much to grow a head of lettuce? Those sneaky snooks who make house paint have some 'splaining to do too.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Landmammals@lemmy.world 32 points 10 months ago

They were also lying about closing stores because of too much shoplifting

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Th4tGuyII@kbin.social 28 points 10 months ago

In a market that expects infinite growth in a finite reality, I can assure you that I'm not the least bit surprised that companies are using "inflation" as an excuse to gouge their customers for what increasingly little they have

[-] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 21 points 10 months ago

The Nordics I think figured out a solution to this,

You might be familiar with all the classic arguments decrying rent controls for causing supply shortages as people refuse to give up their RCd housing,

Well up in northern Europe they don't have rent control, they have rent hike control, basically you can only raise rent by a given percentage at most per year, in the US, we could tie that percentage cap to the percent change change in federal interest rates, pass some of that market rally back to the consumers since a rate drop leads to a mandatory profit margin drop to match.

[-] cannibalkitteh@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 10 months ago

The Nordics I think figured out a solution to this,

The French did too, it's called the guillotine.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Chewget@lemm.ee 21 points 10 months ago

You don't say

[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago
[-] iyaerP@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago

This is my surprised face.

:|

[-] veganpizza69@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)
[-] ChillCapybara@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 10 months ago

Bread and circuses only work when people can afford the bread and circuses. But capitalism demands growth at the cost of all else. The only way out of this mess is when it eats its own tail I imagine. Some say the inevitable collapse of society should be hastened for the greater good. Obviously that’s far too simple a statement, but I’m not well versed on it. Someone hit me with your 2 cents.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] EmperorHenry@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 10 months ago

Of course corporations are lying to have a reason to raise prices.

The executives at every corpo would throw a million puppies into a wood chipper if it gained them an extra penny.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] girlfreddy@sh.itjust.works 14 points 10 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Agent_Engelbert@linux.community 14 points 10 months ago

Not surprised. Black rock company is probably in the lead when it comes to that.

[-] mmagod@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

the $7 per gallon gas prices and my previous boss forcing me to drive 50 miles to work with a car that was going to give out any moment soon...

piece of shit humans

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2023
1372 points (99.2% liked)

News

23287 readers
3483 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS