191
submitted 11 months ago by alyaza@beehaw.org to c/gaming@beehaw.org

apparently this is in response to a few threads on Reddit flaming Starfield—in general, it's been rather interesting to see Bethesda take what i can only describe as a "try to debate Starfield to popularity" approach with the game's skeptics in the past month or two. not entirely sure it's a winning strategy, personally.

(page 2) 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] GammaGames@beehaw.org 7 points 11 months ago

I don’t see anything wrong with what he said. It reminds me of all the whining about jUsT fIx ThE NeTcOdE or (more recently) tHe TeEtH mAkE iT LaG

Lots of people with opinions based on other’s opinions, where nobody in the chain has my clue what they’re talking about.

[-] araneae@beehaw.org 5 points 11 months ago

This kind of silly shit is on brand for Pagliarulo.

[-] taanegl@beehaw.org 1 points 11 months ago

Look, it's very simple - even a cocaine addled exec can see. You remove a fair deal of your gameplay time, say 1/3, and focus budget and development time on quality control and polish. I.e quality over quantity. This is a matter of management and Bethesda's management is dumb. It's not rocket science, it's just business.

[-] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 11 months ago

Reading that dev's opinion is almost as much a waste of time as playing Starfield

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2023
191 points (100.0% liked)

Gaming

30500 readers
315 users here now

From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it's gaming you can probably discuss it here!

Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.

See also Gaming's sister community Tabletop Gaming.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS