1263
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] tengkuizdihar@discuss.online 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Vivaldi? Trusting a closed sourced application for privacy? What?

Not even defending brave here, just weird that the author say that.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] mirror_slap@lemmy.film 18 points 1 year ago

Well, fork, I hadn't looked at this team behind Brave. I use both Firefox and Brave. Bye bye Brave...

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 year ago

I hadn't read the details of their intended ad network. I just recall it sounded shady. Now that I read about it, it sounds very similar conceptually to Google's Privacy Sandbox. I'm not sure if this is a better or worse approach than the status quo but I surely don't trust Brave Inc, a startup with a questionable business model and investors, with gathering and processing this data.

[-] QuazarOmega@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Out of the box Firefox is definitely not very privacy conscious, better than Chrome no doubt, but worse than Brave. It can be configured to be better than both or one can use Librewolf/Mullvad browser

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] nomadjoanne@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Honestly I don't care who or what he personally donated to. But the ad model is the problem for me.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MrPloppy@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 year ago

Anyone here ragging on brave that is on a Windows platform has got a real funky view of privacy. By percentage, that is probably most.

load more comments (8 replies)

Maybe it's me but some of the things in this articles make me question their reporting.

What makes sense to me is that they have been involved with some shady crypto companies and they have been opaque about their goals, with some of the developers disagreeing with the CEO every now and again.

What rubs me the wrong way is the focus on his own political viewpoint (this is holy irrelevant to the software), his involvement with FTX (almost no one saw the collapse coming. It was one of only a few crypto companies that people didn't expect to be that shady) and getting a cease and desist from a newspaper corporation (this is much expected and frankly idk if the cease and desist even holds up. This is not as shady as the article makes it out to be and legally this is not cotton dry at all iirc. IANAL tho ofc)

I agree it's not the best idea to mindlessly go on using Brave, but honestly this article is really not that good.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] seitanic@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 1 year ago

The writer is proposing Vivaldi, a closed-source browser, as an alternative to Brave, which is free and open-source. I think a better alternative would be Ungoogled Chromium.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] gunpachi@lemmings.world 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If you put aside the crypto crap, Brave is an okay browser. Sometimes I use it for web development. But I don't like the direction the company is heading towards.

Most of the time I use Firefox with Extensions and Librewolf for everything. Firefox has been my go-to for years and I sure hope it stays that way.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2023
1263 points (89.9% liked)

Technology

59598 readers
2364 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS