110
submitted 1 year ago by Los@beehaw.org to c/technology@beehaw.org
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] spirit@beehaw.org 40 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Update 2: My conclusion


Update: So I dug around a little deeper, and found that


On another topic, there are rumors circulating that we are fascists or supported genocide. These claims are completely false, and like most viral twitter threads, are coming from a single Mastodon user on a personal vendetta who didn’t provide any sources. Such slander doesn’t deserve any response and is best left ignored.

Update: More info about @dessalines@lemmy.ml

[-] SilentStorms@lemmy.fmhy.ml 39 points 1 year ago

I don't agree with these views at all, but I don't agree with the view that no one should use lemmy because of the opinions of the developers. Its an open-source project, just don't use anything hosted by them. Like I don't support the US military, but that doesn't stop me from using the internet.

[-] 0xtero@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago

This is just it. Software is software. You can spin your own instance and moderate it as you wish. It's open source, so you can change and modify it.
But right now they're asking for donations to run their instance and help with their code.

So before you donate money and your time/expertise/code - it's probably a good idea to know who is asking for it. It's not entirely clear, to be honest.

[-] bartera@beehaw.org 12 points 1 year ago

Exactly. I probably don't agree on everything with 100% of developers of the tool out there. I don't want creators of technological tools (or anyone for that matter) to be subject to purity of ideology and opinion tests. I didn't want Brendan Eich gone from Mozilla nor anyone else gone from the tools they develop.

[-] barsoap@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

One sore point there is that the code comes by default with a donation link (the heart at the top) to join-lemmy.org. Even without the tankie issue it should rather go to a page local to the instance explaining donation options, and the default should be "The admin didn't set this up, if you urgently need to get rid of money here's a link to Doctors without Borders".

OTOH there's now a huge influx of people including tons of developers so I expect tankie influence to be drowned out sooner than later.

[-] SilentStorms@lemmy.fmhy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

Yeah, developers of new instances should probably edit that out.

I don't think its a huge issue though, looking at that page the number of people who have donated more than $10 is like... a dozen.

[-] conderoga@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago

A bunch of developers isn't going to do anything though if they retain control over everything. I think after learning about this background, and their weird claims surrounding it yesterday, the path forward I would prefer is for a strong fork to emerge of the original code that instances deploy instead.

[-] barsoap@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I prophesied that to happen back on reddit but with FLOSS development culture being as it is pre-emptive forking is kinda considered the same as a pre-emptive nuclear strike. It's just not done in polite company.

I'm about 100% that there's going to come a make-or break situation where, if the developers don't concede, there will be a fork, but it could also be that the devs are conscious enough of what's happening that they'll cave under the pressure and thus manage to retain some influence over the project.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] lodion@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

Neither of those show the claimed genocide denial/support.

[-] lodion@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago
[-] Nine@programming.dev 13 points 1 year ago

Oh boy! That entire page is definitely something. As someone born in a comunist country I can only pitty people like that. They must have had some pretty sheltered lives in order to be this detached from reality. As others have said it is impressive what they've done with the platform and deserve prays for it, but man those views are going to push a lot of users away, especially when they are so public.

[-] EthicalAI@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago

Which country if you don’t mind me asking?

[-] Nine@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago

The one that had a pretty bad revolution to get rid of communism 😉. The problem with communism is that, since they achieve power through illegal means, they also refuse to leave when the people, who they are supposed to represent, don't want them anymore.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] barsoap@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's the tankie "It's not a genocide, no I'm not denying that people are getting murdered I'm saying that they had it coming for reasons other than being of a particular group" kind of genocide denial-support.

About the only thing that makes tankies not technically fascist is that they come up with elaborate rationalisations of why everything they do serves the common good. They manage to rationalise any and all human rights abuses and atrocities as "necessary evil".

Once upon a time a German lyricist/composer wrote a song satirising that kind of attitude. The GDR's ruling party adopted is as their hymn, unironically. Do watch it it's glorious in its insanity.

[-] cnnrduncan@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago

Most far-right fascists also make up excuses for the genocides they support - the Nazis said that Jewish people were responsible for the collapse of the Weimar economy (and a lot of other bullshit) for example.

[-] barsoap@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Yeah but fascists don't believe it, or even put much effort in those arguments. It's merely a signal to their supporters saying "Yep we hate Jews".

And I do grant tankies the point that they don't inherently hate Uyghurs -- what they hate is there being cultural aspects not under their control as that means a current of mass psychology outside of party control. The most they will countenance is "Socialism with Uyghur characteristics" next to "Socialism with Chinese characteristics", under the condition that it's about weave patterns of traditional hats or something, not loyalty to the party's prerogative of interpretation: If Bejing thinks a particular weave pattern is counter-revolutionary then it is, Uyghurs don't get a say.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] WTFisthisOMGreally@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Idk how to save comments so replying

[-] barsoap@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

Click on the three dots next to reply, click on the star.

...wait you're using kbin. No idea.

[-] noodlejetski@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

...bookmark it in your browser?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] polygon@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

Not sure what I make of that. He quoted a guy, rather than giving his own opinion. We can make a lot of assumptions about why he quoted the guy, but without stating an opinion it can only ever be speculation. In a massive list of essays, which I admittedly haven't read all of, one quote seems to be the big uproar about fascists running Lemmy?

And then being like "Hey maybe don't delete posts just because they're about China? That doesn't break any rules," suddenly makes them in love with the CCP? I don't have any context to judge the quote and posts regarding China literally do not break any rule. "Orientalism" is a ridiculous reason to delete a post.

This all seems completely blown out of proportion like typical Twitter drama.

[-] barsoap@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Calling something orientalism, in a Neo-Marxist context, is, roughly, calling Marx's Eurocentrism problematic, which is 110% fucking fair. Used by a tankie it means "You can't criticise China because you're not Chinese".

load more comments (12 replies)
[-] 0xtero@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

There's also these:
https://raddle.me/f/lobby/96713/heads-up-the-tankie-behind-lemmy-ml-got-banned-from-r
https://raddle.me/f/TankiesGonnaTank/89852/the-lemmy-ml-admin-is-banning-anyone-that-mentions-stalin-or
(google cache since the site is down) https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:KNky1TdNscwJ:https://lemmy.pineapplemachine.com/post/5781&cd=13&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=se&client=firefox-b-d

And I believe there's some allegations of them hosting the lemmygrad.ml instance, which is basically full on tankie home.

Basically, they don't think Uyghur genocide happened, they don't think Stalin did anything wrong and they love Xi.

And now they're asking for your money

[-] mbryson@lemmy.ca 33 points 1 year ago

I'm really enjoying Lemmy to be honest. A decentralized platform rekindles the feeling of internet forums and the excitement of finding something new in each community. Seeing such a candid report from the developers is nice as well and reaffirms my decision to stay, regardless of reddit's decisions or direction as a platform.

Keep up the great work everyone involved!

Agreed, it feels a lot more intimate and the growing pains are honestly not that bad

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Rentlar@beehaw.org 29 points 1 year ago

Sure, I think the tankie and extremely pro-CCP/Kremlin views expressed by the developers and lemmygrad server members are outright dumb. But I do appreciate that they leave room for all of us of differing views to exist without constantly clashing, by creating this federated system.

You know you've done well when you've made something that's bigger than yourself and your own interests.

[-] Scary_le_Poo@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Is there any actual proof of this? I have seen it repeated over and over and over, but I have yet to see literally anyone provide receipts.

[-] Rentlar@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

Sorry if I didn't provide sufficient proof, depends on which aspect you would have liked me to clarify on?

tankie views: essays on github by the main developers I'm not trying to argue right or wrong in this comment, just to show these are texts representing the beliefs held by the lead developer.

Tankie moderation: Orientalism stipulated as reason for comment rule and ban on a Ukraine-related thread

Creating something bigger than themselves: From open sourcing lemmy, and structuring lemmy in a way that gives liberty for instance owners to rule as they please.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] cityboundforest@beehaw.org 22 points 1 year ago

I do appreciate the transparency from the Lemmy devs and re their views (whether only alleged or actual) on controversial topics, I think the issue is not in the software itself and in how the devs themselves are using it. However given the nature of the fediverse and how Lemmy is programmed, you can use the software however you like, as we do here on Beehaw.

Similarly, we can look to the "death of the author" debate to settle this. I'm not going to discuss what that is and what it isn't here (as that isn't the purpose of this post or this comment), however, I will state that my definition of "death of the author" involves critically enjoying a piece of media despite its author's bad views if and only if those views aren't inherent to the work and they aren't profiting off of my consumption of the work itself. Beehaw is like that. Sure the creators of the software are involved in a controversy, but the way the devs use their own software is not an inherent feature of the software. Beehaw has a fantastic setup and ethos, so I find my home here. Sure, there's not that many specific communities, but that's what federation is for.

Another analogy, however accurate (no analogy is perfect): people lobby governments with money to get them to pass problematic legislation, but people still participate in the economy.

note on that analogy because I feel it needs sayingYes, I know that participating in the economy, especially in the United States where I live but really anywhere is a bit necessary to, well, exist most places if not everywhere, but people unknowingly support controversial people all the time. See Nestle and their controversies. Even bringing that up reminds me of the illusion of choice and how everything is owned by five companies (and even then mostly everything is owned by like two VC groups). I'm digressing, of course, but I hope you see my point in bringing this up.

TL;DR: The way the devs use the software should not impede our use of the software given that the devs' views are not inherent to any use case of the software.

[-] StrayCatFrump@beehaw.org 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I agree with the first part. I completely fail to see how the analogy at the end applies. Capitalists and their corporations lobby the government to pass legislation that directly fucks the economy to make it worse for working-class people who use it (and, in fact, depend on it for their basic survival). So it's much, much more like Reddit where people have to use the one corporate system that exploits and oppresses them than like someone developing a piece of FOSS software that other people can use independently. In fact, if you try to build a separate economy, the state's violent enforcers (police and/or military, depending on the context) will come in and abuse and murder you and tear apart your independent economy and force people back into the fold.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] pixel@beehaw.org 18 points 1 year ago

For all the issues with the lemmy developers (and they're completely valid, though I'm not as familiar with the ins and outs of the discourse given how new I am to the fediverse) I appreciate their candor. I guess part of it is just that I'm used to corporate speak when receiving website updates and what not, but as long as they're receptive to changes that the platform needs and continue to make the platform more stable, safer, and more feature-rich, it's nice having a home on the fediverse run by genuine people, even if they're people I'm not the most aligned with ideally -- to be charitable

It's so refreshing having a statement written by two people, instead of a board of lawyers.

[-] thedarkfly@feddit.nl 17 points 1 year ago

It seems to have become a habit that most good things about the internet is linked to the EU. I'm really grateful. That being said, I hope that Lemmy can become a collaborative project uniting a lot of devs rather than rely on two people.

About the scandal; as long as their opinions do not influence the platform I don't see them as relevant to Lemmy. If they are illegal, let justice do its work.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] heartlessevil@lemmy.one 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

On another topic, there are rumors circulating that we are fascists or supported genocide. These claims are completely false, and like most viral twitter threads, are coming from a single Mastodon user on a personal vendetta who didn’t provide any sources. Such slander doesn’t deserve any response and is best left ignored.

My "Not involved in genocide denial" T-shirt has people asking a lot of questions already answered by my shirt

[-] sarsaparilyptus@lemmy.fmhy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

To Dessalines it's not genocide because they had it coming, so it's all internally consistent

[-] rs5th@lemmy.scottlabs.io 12 points 1 year ago

This update, specifically how funding is happening, helped me understand some of the reasoning behind the narrow focus of the Lemmy developers. I appreciate them foregoing their regular paychecks to work on stability. Hopefully things settle down soon to the point that the extra eyes and hands on the project are more helpful than they are distracting.

[-] lukini@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago

Wow they went from 1 user to 27. It feels like way more than 27 people

(I'm aware of what they meant, but it's incorrect in English)

[-] SamVimes@beehaw.org 17 points 1 year ago
[-] lukini@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago

Yes, every single English speaking country uses a period for decimals. And English Wikipedia requires it in their style guide.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] JurassicPork@lemmy.one 5 points 1 year ago

Thanks for sharing! Great project. Think I'll head over and donate 😊

[-] McBinary@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Thanks for the link. I don't know the story, but I find it interesting that these two devs are essentially being sponsored to develop Lemmy. What sort of incentive does the sponsor have for funding this development?

[-] cura@beehaw.org 8 points 1 year ago

This project was funded through the NGI0 Discovery Fund, a fund established by NLnet with financial support from the European Commission's Next Generation Internet programme, under the aegis of DG Communications Networks, Content and Technology under grant agreement No 825322.

Source: https://nlnet.nl/project/Lemmy/

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2023
110 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37758 readers
643 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS