644

Saudi Arabia mandates all electronic devices to use USB-C charging ports from 2025 (www.gsmarena.com)

submitted 1 year ago by schizoidman@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.world

138 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] FReddit@lemmy.world 102 points 1 year ago

And people will be dismembered if they fail to comply.

[+] abort_christian_babies@lemmy.world 63 points 1 year ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

[deleted]

[-] FoxBJK@midwest.social 62 points 1 year ago

Not that a new connector is around the corner, but I love how people try to act like this will be an achilles heel for these laws. How long will it take to vote in an amendment that updates the connector?

I get it, being anchored to one connection type sounds good now while it's still somewhat new, but in 10 years it could be a burden. Still, I do not want to go back to the days of every device having a unique barrel connector.

[-] AProfessional@lemmy.world 57 points 1 year ago

Many people have been taught regulation is bad, not much logic to it.

USB-C as a connector can easily last a decade, much longer for just power delivery.

[-] FoxBJK@midwest.social 18 points 1 year ago

Exactly! Most electronics are surprisingly low-powered, but USB-C can currently support 100W with a draft spec with upwards of 240W. We'll be fine for awhile.

[-] Mic_Check_One_Two@reddthat.com 9 points 1 year ago

Yeah, USB-C is fine for even mid-grade laptops. Realistically, if your device is using more than 100W then it probably has an IEC plug (or at least, an in-line power brick with an IEC port) instead. Pretty much the only thing USB-C isn’t suitable for currently is gaming laptops, because those easily draw upwards of 200W.

load more comments (2 replies)

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] LetMeEatCake@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

I'd be surprised if USB-C was a limitation on phone technology even by 2040. The bandwidth and power delivery capacity are way beyond what are needed now. Data transfers from phones are going to increasingly move to wireless in that time frame too, I expect.

The limitation on the viability of USB-C with phones won't be the actual technological viability of the standard with respect to phones. Instead, the problem for USB-C for phones will be if another standard comes out and starts being used by other devices that do need higher bandwidth or power delivery capability. Monitors, storage devices, laptops (etc.) will eventually need more than USB-C can provide, even with future updates to its capacity. When those switch over to something new, that will be when phones (and other devices) will need to consider a new standard too.

[-] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago

Remember what we said and acted on 20 years ago about technology? Yeaaahh...That's what yousaid right now.

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments (6 replies)

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] LucasWaffyWaf@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

I collect old handhelds. Each one having a unique charging and/or sync cable fuckin sucks and I'm so glad that USB is ubiquitous. My current daily driver has mini USB for data, but charges using a unique connector that plugs into a unique cradle that sends power to the device when hooked into the cradle. Without the cradle, ya ain't charging this thing.

[-] electromage@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

Well USB-C was published 9 years ago, and has been well-established, nearly ubiquitous for at least 5. Why did this take so long?

load more comments (2 replies)

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 39 points 1 year ago

USB-C is a connector shape, so there's really no need for a USB-D. What you're thinking of is USB 5.0, except the USB has a penchant for coming up with the dumbest names imaginable. The current latest (I think) version is 3.2 Gen 2x2, so the next major version will probably be called some bullshit like USB 3.2 Gen 2x2+1.

load more comments (3 replies)

load more comments (2 replies)

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 50 points 1 year ago

Well that's handy, because thanks to the EU that's what everything will be using anyway.

What else are they going to mandate? That sand remains course and irritating? Or more likely demand that the rest of the world stops laughing at their Jetsons city idea.

load more comments (8 replies)

[-] simple@lemm.ee 27 points 1 year ago

There is a second stage, starting from April 1, 2026, which will apply to laptops and portable computers.

I'm with them on small devices using USB C, but all laptops is a pretty tall task. Can gaming laptops that need a high voltage even use USB-C? They already struggle with massive charging bricks and thick cables.

[-] Voyajer@lemmy.ml 45 points 1 year ago

The latest USB power delivery standard allows for new voltages of 28, 36, and 48 volts at up to 240 watts at 48V. My current Dell workstation laptop uses two 20V USB C connectors to achieve similar.

[-] grue@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm imaginining some kind of monstrosity of a gaming laptop with a power cable that looks like a hydra splitting into three or four USB-C connectors, and it's gloriously silly.

Maybe it's time for a new thing similar to USB 3.0 micro B, with two USB-C connectors next to each other on the same plug.

[-] Voyajer@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

Pretty much, they magnet together though so you can split them apart and use them as normal with other devices.

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] Mic_Check_One_Two@reddthat.com 6 points 1 year ago

I’m chuckling at the idea of someone plugging in an early USB-C device and watching it go up in flames as it gets hit with 48v instead of the 5v that it’s rated for. I know USB-C has a chip that is supposed to negotiate power transfer, but it’s still a funny “what if” thought.

load more comments (4 replies)

[-] min0nim@aussie.zone 9 points 1 year ago

Not gaming (obviously!) but the2019 MacBook Pro has a 140W USB-C charger to a single port.

[-] mark3748@geddit.social 7 points 1 year ago

2019 is 96w charger. 140w is 2021 or later.

[-] NekkoDroid@programming.dev 9 points 1 year ago

I recently bought a gaming laptop. Specifically a Lenovo Legion 5 with a rx 6600. It has both the big powerbrick charger and can be charged via USB-PD, obv not at the same speed but it is an option that is available.

[-] TenderfootGungi@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Probably. But your will have to buy the correct charger and cable. I have a couple 100W cables. The problem is they Al look alike.

load more comments (2 replies)

[-] JoYo@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

your gaming laptop is struggling because gaming laptops are scams. you'll never get the performance you want and you'll pay the premium anyways.

load more comments (3 replies)

[-] Fluke@discuss.online 7 points 1 year ago

Will this global push end up limiting miniaturization of electronics? Even if it does, may still be a worthwhile tradeoff.

[-] DauntingFlamingo@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago

It aims to eliminate waste by reducing the number of cords and plugs required for various devices. It will surely have to be upgraded and miniaturized as tech progresses, but for now it's one everyone is agreeing on.

One aspect to consider for miniature devices is wireless charging. My watch and my headphones don't even have a port

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments

this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2023

644 points (96.9% liked)

Technology

59038 readers

3190 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS