1

APIs for content sites must be free (🔥 Score: 152+ in 2 hours)

Link: https://readhacker.news/s/5GSi2 Comments: https://readhacker.news/c/5GSi2

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Penguincoder@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

Not the Hacker News that I'm familiar with.

[-] remi_pan@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Like the author of this paper said, for me it's not really about third party apps. The problem is that reddit try to monetize a content that is our collective property.

[-] Rentlar@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, pretty much this. When I post anything on social media I intend to speak publicly to anyone who wishes to listen. I'm not speaking to Reddit, Lemmy, whoever in confidence, so no matter what the ToS says, my intent is any advice or anecdote I give is anyone's to view and use, not in the content host's sole ownership.

[-] nude@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Is it our property though?

Intellectually speaking yes, but legally speaking? Probably not. Chances are if its stored on their servers, it belongs to them.

[-] ___hulk@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Legally, currently, yeah. Needs to change though. I'm ok with monetizing the presentation and delivery but if you want to use collective property you should still have to make that available as part of the deal.

[-] Parallax@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Replacing "comment" with "artwork" kind of helps illustrate it. If we all made tons of artwork for Reddit, then they started gating it behind a paywall and while painters and all the behind-the-scenes painting staff earned nothing -- well that's kinda where we are today.

[-] EnglishMobster@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

But what you mentioned absolutely happens, though.

It's €17 to go to the Louvre. Many of the paintings there are public domain, which logically says they should be free as they have no owners. Yet to see them, most people need to pay €17.

Those are paintings locked behind a paywall. The pieces may be donated freely by an artist - just as users contribute freely on a website - but the museum still charges for admission.

So while I'm not defending the practice - and there are many free museums; even the Louvre has ways to get in for free - it's also not exactly a way to convince others that the practice is inherently bad.

[-] GrandChicken@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

I figure its fair to charge for access if you pay the moderators and the contributors.

Seems like they are taking over the moderator roles now, by force. Maybe the mods will also be the main contributors soon?

this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37573 readers
500 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS