170
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 58 points 10 months ago

The rightoids make death threats for everything.

[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 21 points 10 months ago
[-] Klicnik@sh.itjust.works 4 points 10 months ago

I am both thrilled and disappointed to see the exact thing I was going to comment.

[-] TigrisMorte@kbin.social 40 points 10 months ago

Hmm, using threats of terrorism to terrorize on behalf of a Legally declared Insurrectionist. I think there is something someone is supposed to do about those things. Next, how the death threats in Colorado are bad for Biden.

[-] hydrashok@sh.itjust.works 37 points 10 months ago

GOP: “State’s rights!!!!1”

Also GOP: “No, not like that!”

[-] Jaysyn@kbin.social 16 points 10 months ago

Can't wait to hear about the follow up arrests regarding this next week.

[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 7 points 10 months ago

Bet there will be a few pulling a gun to get swiss cheesed by the FBI. No big loss.

[-] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

These right-wing~~b~~nutz need a death-certificate 🤬

[-] pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe 7 points 10 months ago

I fear they will get the civil war they want, and the country will be destroyed in the process.

[-] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 5 points 10 months ago

Sometimes you gotta break the thingand replace it with something new because the glue and tape isn't working anymore

[-] pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe 3 points 10 months ago

I wish the factions could sit down together and figure this shit out, because the one thing we all have in common is that none of us are happy with the way things are.

[-] davidgro@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Problem is, we are unhappy about different parts of the way things are, and even worse, the same parts in opposite directions.

[-] ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

The actual problem is the right wing's inability to compromise because of the religious core of the GOP. This is why Republicans block anything from getting through Congress and waste time doing shit like slow walking the Hunter Biden case because they can't get anything on the actual POTUS.

[-] davidgro@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Agreed. I was just pointing out that even giving them the benefit of the doubt (which you are right, we shouldn't) it is Still not as simple as just finding commonalities - many things we think are good they directly consider bad and vice versa.

[-] lfcitz@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Trying to imagine what that would look like. National guard squaring off against militias? Does the US military break apart? Big jump in bombings?

[-] Jimmyeatsausage@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

I imagine it will just be lots of lone wolf domestic terrorism.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Maybe not lone-wolf, but yes. It’ll look more like The Troubles, than any war we’ve seen. Neighbor on neighbor,

[-] Garbanzo@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Texas LEOs traveling to Oregon to arrest doctors for treating trans kids and getting fucking wrecked by socialists with guns would be a civil war I could get behind

[-] PM_ME_YOUR_ZOD_RUNES@sh.itjust.works 12 points 10 months ago

Is this supposed to be a surprise or something? Trump supporters are brain dead bully's who will do anything to get their way. Not saying it's ok, just that everyone should expect shit like this from these morons at this point.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 7 points 10 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Justices on the Colorado supreme court are receiving a barrage of death threats after it ruled to exclude Donald Trump from the state’s presidential ballot next year because of his attempts to cause insurrection.

A report compiled by Advance Democracy, a non-partisan non-profit organization, said there was “significant violent rhetoric” against the justices and Democrats on social media, according to NBC News.

Another post on The Donald, a pro-Trump forum where a Trump supporter once publicly bragged about his involvement with the January 6 insurrection and was arrested as a result, said “this ends when we kill these fuckers”.

“The normalization of this type of violent rhetoric – and lack of remedial action by social media entities – is cause for significant concern,” Daniel J Jones, president of Advance Democracy, told NBC News.

Trump’s lawyers in his fraud trial argued that the former president, who faces 91 criminal charges and is an adjudicated rapist, has no control over those who levy violent threats.

Senator Chris Coons of Delaware, a close ally of Biden, called it “striking” and said it is “undeniable in my view that [Trump] participated in an insurrection and as such should be disqualified from holding federal office.”


The original article contains 507 words, the summary contains 200 words. Saved 61%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2023
170 points (99.4% liked)

politics

19138 readers
4179 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS