213
submitted 10 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Marjorie Taylor Greene says replacing the speaker is “absolutely on the table,” but several of his colleagues maintain his job is safe for now

It’s June 2023, and the Republican speaker of the House is struggling to appease the hard-line members of his conference, who are angry that he reached a bipartisan deal on government spending levels. A faction of conservatives sink a procedural vote in a rebuke to party leadership.

It’s October 2023, and the Republican speaker of the House is facing an internal revolt from members of his own party furious that he forced passage of a short-term government funding measure to avert a shutdown. Eight GOP representatives, some of them with a personal grudge against the speaker, join all House Democrats in ousting Kevin McCarthy from the post; after three weeks and much intraparty agita, little-known Louisiana Republican Mike Johnson ascends to the position.

It’s January 2024, and the Republican speaker of the House is struggling to appease the hard-line members of his conference, who are angry that he has reached a bipartisan deal on government spending levels. On Wednesday, a faction of conservatives sank a procedural vote in a rebuke to party leadership.

all 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] teamevil@lemmy.world 50 points 10 months ago

Don't negotiate with terrorists is rule number one. Someone tell Georgia's worst horse.

[-] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 40 points 10 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

deleted by creator

[-] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 36 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I want them to remove Mikey not just because he's a dangerous wackjob liar but also to see if they can break more records trying to elect the next speaker.

On the other hand a functional government would be nice but that's a pipe dream.

[-] Jaysyn@kbin.social 30 points 10 months ago

These people don't actually want a functioning government at all.

They are working for #Putin.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 26 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

“In this process, the most important thing is your word. And so if you break your word, you can never negotiate anything,” Diaz-Balart told reporters. “Like it or not, we have a top-line agreement.”

I keep thinking I'll never be surprised at what a Republican says anymore...

But this is like a turtle telling you that if he couldn't soar through the air like an eagle, life wouldn't be worth living.

Bruh, you're a turtle, your whole deal is not soaring thru anything.

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago

Good lord, when the literal christo-fascist isn't conservative enough...

[-] carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 21 points 10 months ago

I triple dog dare them!

[-] Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee 13 points 10 months ago

Oh please do. Waiting for them to whine that the Democrats are obligated to stop them from screwing their own party.

[-] Nobody@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

Christofascist Howdy Doody has lasted longer than a head of lettuce, so he has that going for him.

[-] zurohki@aussie.zone 9 points 10 months ago

How many Scaramuccis is it per head of lettuce again?

[-] NovaPrime@lemmy.ml 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

A standard Mooch is 10 days, and Truss was PM for 50, so the conversion ends up being 5 mooches for every 1 lettuce heads.

Edit: as mosiacmango pointed out below, I reversed my units. It should be 5 mooches for every trussy. Leaving original for response comment context.

[-] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

You inverted your units there. 5 mooches a lettuce head, which should also be called a "Trussy" in my opinion.

[-] NovaPrime@lemmy.ml 4 points 10 months ago

You're correct. Dummy mistake 😆

[-] TwattyMctwatterson@lemmings.world 9 points 10 months ago

Looks like that mandate from God don't hold as much water as it used to lol

[-] Rolder@reddthat.com 4 points 10 months ago

Waiting for them to oust so many republicans that the democrats get the majority back

[-] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Heh. 'negotiating'

this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2024
213 points (97.3% liked)

politics

19089 readers
1480 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS