186
Harris Warns of ‘Profound Threat’ to America’s Freedoms
(www.nytimes.com)
Everyone:
No shit.
Then vote.
Everyone:
Too much work
Or specifically for lemmy:
both sides are terrible so I refuse to participate
I'm voting for Cornel West. He has a chance. You can't prove he doesn't.
Sad to say this, but it looks like Lemmy is more vulnerable to bots than Reddit. I guess there are more spread out communities over multiple servers and less moderators. The comments with negative votes are still being displayed without being collapsed or removed.
No one here is proclaiming that..
Plz take that back to REddit where you found it.
I know that I and people around me will be actively working to keep Trump out of office. That means kicking in money and volunteer time if you can. If you have the means, consider a fall trip to help out in a swing state or a swing congressional district.
Do you know how hard Republicans make it to vote in the districts that matter? Your glib comment suggests you don't.
I'm quite well aware. The supreme Court says the way to fix that is to vote them out. Not much else to do.
Not much else to do.
Well, except for all the tactics the Supreme Court doesn't approve of.
Great motivation to vote. They might have a shitty idea of what competent leadership looks like, but at least Republicans fight for their rights when they think someone is trying to take them away.
Keep pretending that voting doesn't matter and it'll eventually come true, and much sooner than you can imagine. People have literally died by the millions to achieve the democracy we take for granted. But it's not granted, it's earned by societies who remain vigilant and actively defend it.
Keep pretending that voting doesn’t matter and it’ll eventually come true, and much sooner than you can imagine.
Who is doing this? Certainly not me. Thanks for the lecture though.
Not talking to you, talking to any potential non-voters who might read your comment and think "true, it's the politicians fault, not mine"
If I need to look like an asshole lecturer with a stick up my ass for the next 10 months then so be it, I want my kids to live in a democracy like I did.
Right?
So, like, do something then??
Its because we dont collectively stop what we're doing and protest until the asphalt comes off the streets. Whether theres too many people, the powers are too adept at herd splitting, or any other reason, we do not scare the people in control enough anymore. Remember, every right you enjoy was written in blood. This is what was meant by refreshing the tree of liberty with the blood of patriots. Dregs and downtrodden of the world unite, and break the dawn that was taken from you.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
Vice President Kamala Harris warned on Monday that American freedom was “under profound threat” in a speech honoring the Rev.
Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. in South Carolina, amplifying a message that the Biden administration has made a rallying cry of its re-election bid.
She urged the crowd of more than 100 to continue to fight for the constitutional promises Dr. King spent his life holding America accountable for.
Ms. Harris visited Myrtle Beach on Jan. 6, the third anniversary of the deadly attack on the Capitol, and delivered a similar message as she and Mr. Biden, who was in Charleston two days later, try to rally Black voters.
In Columbia, Ms. Harris stopped at a campaign event, where she reiterated to supporters that there was “a full-on, intentional attack against hard-fought and hard-won freedoms and rights.”
Ms. Harris also told supporters that it was South Carolinans who helped inform some of the administration’s most successful policies, such as expanding access to high-speed internet in rural areas, tackling the removal of lead pipes and lowering insulin prices.
The original article contains 571 words, the summary contains 177 words. Saved 69%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
Very rich, coming from the DNC who outright cancelled their own Primaries not even allowing members to vote for ANY other candidates than who they already decided.
Do these people do not own mirrors or do they really think everyone of them plebs they look down onto are stupid?
You can in fact vote for whoever you want in the Democratic primaries. It's just that Biden has something like 70% or more support.
Literally a 3 second search. I mean, why lie?
https://www.politico.com/news/2023/11/30/florida-democrats-dean-phillips-election-00129403
The point, to anyone with eyes, is that debates are a healthy way to measure a candidate's skills and mental capacity and to be seen in touch with the interests of the American people. Also, it gives at least the impression of a Democracy. Not here, however. Not even opening the door is anti-democratic. Hence my point. Worth noting that Biden won in NH yesterday despite not even being in the ballot. The miracles of mail voting, amiright? https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4418655-biden-new-hampshire-democratic-primary-ballot/ Man, is there such thing as TOO MUCH Democratic transparency? Can you feel it? I can.
Worth nothing that Biden's popularity is through the floor throughout the USA. This should not and cannot be ignored. So your claim does not hold as much water as you think it does. https://news.gallup.com/poll/547763/biden-ends-2023-job-approval.aspx
My take is that they will flip Biden for Newson with people have no say on it. But we will see if that happens, if that happens, remember this post! :-)
NH has almost no vote-by-mail ballots; the state has fairly narrow criteria for getting one
Biden won the NH primary because people showed up to vote in person and wrote his name in.
What you're doing is conspiracy-mongering.
this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2024
186 points (97.0% liked)
politics
19145 readers
1533 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS