-46
He also thinks Trump shouldn’t be removed from any ballot under the 14th amendment, so why do we care about his insight?
If democrats had any intent of keeping him off the ballot they would have charged him with something by now. They need him as a viable villain to keep voters in line and scared.
Who?
Keep in mind, Biden has a long history of not being on the right side of progress as far as civil rights and equality is concerned. For example in the seventies, he voted against bussing to desegregate schools, and voted in support of segregation. Also, he voted against the right to gay marriage in the 90's and was anti-abortion until some one in his presidential campaign and explained how outdated his politics really are.
Oh. also, he chaired the comittee that "interviewed" Anita Hill when her accusations of sexual harassment against Clarence Thomas went public (and just before they went public- when he knew full well the contents of her interviews and affidavits with the FBI said something to the effect of "Nobody disagrees that Clarence THomas is a man of character"
Jill Biden
This is the best summary I could come up with:
Charlamagne Tha God broke out in laughter after being asked if he agreed with First Lady Jill Biden - who boldy said that her 81-year-old husband has the vigor and energy to serve a second presidental term.
The first lady was asked if she had any concerns over Joe's health as he heads towards the 2024 election - giving the firm answer: 'He can do it.'
The Breakfast Club host has been a thorn in the side of the Biden administration, often criticizing the presidents comments and history on race in American.
While guest hosting the Daily Show in December, Charlamagne said the 'ultimate Christmas gift' would be President Joe Biden dropping out of the 2024 race and pleaded with him not to make the same mistake as Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
This comes as Biden's job approval rating has dropped to a low for any president in the past 15 years, according to a poll published Monday.
It makes him less popular that Donald Trump, his likely presidential election opponent, who hit 36 percent approval at the lowest ebb of his time in office.
The original article contains 796 words, the summary contains 182 words. Saved 77%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
'Personally, I don't see that vigor. And I don't think a lot of other Americans see that vigor anyway.'
Charlamagne Tha God continued: 'I think the thing that should scare everybody is when you look across the aisle, and you see a guy that's got 91 criminal charges, he's been impeached twice, he's got four indictments… how are you losing to that guy?'
He went on to question whether Kamala Harris - with Biden - is still a viable Democrat pairing for the ticket this year.
He added: 'That's really the conversation- is Joe Biden and Kamala Harris still a winnable ticket? I think Republicans should be asking themselves that, too. Is Donald Trump still a winnable ticket?'
You're at least consistent with your agenda-posting, I'll give you that, OP.
What's my agenda? It's a political channel. I post political news articles in it.
Lol... Shot down again
Unlike Reddit, we don't gain fake Internet points here ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2024
-46 points (4.0% liked)
politics
19103 readers
1748 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS