deleted

That's why they just removed the military limitations in their terms of service I guess...

I also want to sell my shit for every purpose but take zero responsibility for consequences.

Considering what we've decided to call AI can't actually make decisions, that's a no-brainer.

Shouldn't, but there's absolutely nothing stopping it, and lazy tech companies absolutely will. I mean we live in a world where Boeing built a plane that couldn't fly straight so they tried to fix it with software. The tech will be abused so long as people are greedy.

Has anyone checked on the sister?

OpenAI went from interesting to horrifying so quickly, I just can't look.

OpenAI went from an interesting and insightful company to a horrible and a weird one in a very little time.

I’m tired of dopey white men making the world so much worse.

Agreed, but also one doomsday-prepping capitalist shouldn't be making AI decisions. If only there was some kind of board that would provide safeguards that ensured AI was developed for the benefit of humanity rather than profit...

AI shouldn't make any decisions

I am sure Zergerberg is also claiming that they are not making any life-or-death decisions. Lets see you in a couple years when the military gets involved with your shit. Oh wait they already did but I guess they will just use AI to improve soldiers' canteen experience.

Ummm…no fucking shit. Who was thinking that was a good idea?

So just like shitty biased algorithms shouldn't be making life changing decisions on folks' employability, loan approvals, which areas get more/tougher policing, etc. I like stating obvious things, too. A robot pulling the trigger isn't the only "life-or-death" choice that will be (is!) automated.

is exactly this AI will do in a near future (not dystopia)

But it should drive cars? Operate strike drones? Manage infrastructure like power grids and the water supply? Forecast tsunamis?

Too little too late, Sam. 

Fair enough. I do think AI will become a valuable tool for doctors, etc who do make those decisions

And yet it persuades people to choose for it.

This is the best summary I could come up with:

ChatGPT is one of several generative AI systems that can create content in response to user prompts and which experts say could transform the global economy.

But there are also dystopian fears that AI could destroy humanity or, at least, lead to widespread job losses.

AI is a major focus of this year’s gathering in Davos, with multiple sessions exploring the impact of the technology on society, jobs and the broader economy.

In a report Sunday, the International Monetary Fund predicted that AI will affect almost 40% of jobs around the world, “replacing some and complementing others,” but potentially worsening income inequality overall.

Speaking on the same panel as Altman, moderated by CNN’s Fareed Zakaria, Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff said AI was not at a point of replacing human beings but rather augmenting them.

As an example, Benioff cited a Gucci call center in Milan that saw revenue and productivity surge after workers started using Salesforce’s AI software in their interactions with customers.

The original article contains 443 words, the summary contains 163 words. Saved 63%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

When there's no human to blame because the robot made the decision the ceo should carry all the blame

We've been putting our lives in the hands of automated, programmed decisions for decades now if y'all haven't noticed. The traffic light that keeps you from getting T-boned. The autopilot that keeps your plane straight and level and takes workload off the pilots. The scissor lift that prevents you from raising the platform if it's too tilted. The airbag making a nanosecond-level decision on whether to deploy or not. And many more.