501
Albama (lemy.lol)

Bluesky Post

TranscriptAlabama suffocated a man to death in a gas chamber tonight after starving him so he wouldn't choke on his own vomit as they did it. And this was deemed perfectly legal by multiple courts in the vaunted American legal system.

That's what happens when you value institutions over people.

Link for more info: https://www.reuters.com/legal/alabama-prepares-carry-out-first-execution-by-nitrogen-asphyxiation-2024-01-25/

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] BetaBlake@lemmy.world 305 points 10 months ago

He wasn't "starved", it says right there in the article that he was given his last meal this morning (Thursday) and allowed no solids after 10am because he suffered from nausea and was worried he'd vomit.

It's okay to be anti-execution but you don't have to make shit up to be inflammatory, there's plenty of other valid reasons to be against execution but making sure a man doesn't choke on his own vomit isn't one of them.

[-] astral_avocado@lemm.ee 75 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Plus they're trying to say he suffocated like it was torture, no they used nitrogen specifically so it didn't activate the body's panic response to lack of oxygen. He just fell asleep.

Edit: he didn't just fall asleep because he probably held his breath, according to the article, which I didnt read. In my defense I had a news app blocker on (clearly barely working)

[-] EvacuateSoul@lemmy.world 46 points 10 months ago

And the reason that works is that your body doesn't actually detect low oxygen. When you hold your breath for a long time, the sensation comes from high CO2 levels. That's one reason that working in a hydrogen or helium airship is dangerous, because there can be a leak and you won't even notice until passing out.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz 27 points 10 months ago

Also he specifically requested that they used nitrogen over other methods.

He later changed his request to death by firing squad, but I suspect that may have been a delaying tactic rather than an actual preference.

[-] OceanSoap@lemmy.ml 24 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Which is so much better than injectables, which ARE torture. They get injected with a tranq first so they don't show signs of struggle or pain when the actual death shot is given.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 13 points 10 months ago

He just fell asleep.

eyewitness accounts disagree

"Smith’s spiritual adviser, the Rev. Jeff Hood, who’d previously expressed concern that the method could be inhumane, witnessed the execution and described it in more graphic terms, saying it was 'the most horrible thing I’ve ever seen.'

Smith, wearing a tight-fitting mask that covered his entire face, convulsed when the gas was turned on, 'popped up on the gurney' repeatedly, and gasped, heaved and spat, Hood said.

'It was absolutely horrific,' he said."

"Smith, who was on a gurney, appeared conscious for “several minutes into the execution,” and “shook and writhed” for about two minutes after that, media witnesses said in a joint report."

https://www.cnn.com/2024/01/26/us/alabama-execution-nitrogen-what-we-know/index.html

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 13 points 10 months ago

Witnesses described writhing:

Smith appeared to remain conscious for several minutes after the nitrogen was activated, according to five journalists who were allowed to watch the execution through glass as media witnesses. Although the mask was also secured to the gurney, he then began shaking his head and writhing for about two minutes, and then could be seen breathing deeply for several minutes before his breathing slowed and became imperceptible, the witnesses said.

[-] Perfide@reddthat.com 27 points 10 months ago

They think he was holding his breath, so the CO2 concentration in his blood would have risen. Between the CO2 build up and just knowing you are about to be killed, it's not surprising he started panicking and writhing.

That's what people miss when touting nitrogen asphyxiation as humane. It's only humane if the person being killed willingly gives themselves over to the process and takes nice deep breaths. If they're not willing to die of course they're still going to resist to the best of their abilities and try and get the mask off.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz 13 points 10 months ago

At least part of that was attributed to him holding his breath for as long as possible once they started administrating the gas.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] RiderExMachina@lemmy.ml 98 points 10 months ago

Honestly, if I were to choose suicide, I'd go for a nitrogen slumber. Seems like a painless way to go.

[-] Daefsdeda@sh.itjust.works 39 points 10 months ago

They didn't seem to do it correctly and it took a while. It described in the article but it is horrible.

[-] Commiunism@lemmy.wtf 72 points 10 months ago

Death penalty in the US and not doing it correctly, name a more fitting duo

[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 32 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Obligatory Jacob Geller

Crazy how as our methods of execution get easier to watch, they get more torturous to the individual. Give me a firing squad or a guillotine any day. Y'all lethal inject me, I'm haunting your asses

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 22 points 10 months ago

Hmm, I think I'd choose "cocaine overdose".

[-] NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social 34 points 10 months ago

Sounds fun but it would be a horrible way to die.

2 grams of heroin would be the way to go I would think

[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 11 points 10 months ago

I have no plans now, but maybe I'll try that during the sunset of my life...

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] mkhopper@lemmy.world 29 points 10 months ago

Too dangerous. You might mis-judge the amount and just end up having a good time.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Nacktmull@lemm.ee 62 points 10 months ago

The death penalty is a reason not to consider the USA a civilized country.

[-] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 49 points 10 months ago

Among many. Extrajudicial Executions are far more common than official ones. And the police rob more money of people than all other criminals combined (excluding white collar crime, of course). So yeah, totally civilised.

[-] winterayars@sh.itjust.works 19 points 10 months ago

And the death penalty is not legal in many states, but cops murdering people in the streets is legal in all 50.

load more comments (22 replies)
[-] Zoboomafoo@slrpnk.net 60 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

"Starving?"

I bet surgeons hate you

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 52 points 10 months ago

Bluntly, choking on your own vomit is probably a really terrible way to die. If I recall correctly he was put in a chamber where the majority of the air in the room was replaced with nitrous oxide, asphyxiating the subject. If he had choked on his vomit, it would have been closer to drowning than suffocating in the manner that was intended.

By asphyxiating him in this way, his suffering was effectively eliminated during the execution; but if he had vomited and choked on it.... Well, I don't know if you've ever found yourself short of air in a body of water, but it's a pretty unpleasant experience. It only gets worse as you get closer to death when drowning (from what I've heard/understood from people who have nearly drown).

The intention of not giving him food so he didn't vomit, was a humane decision, not intended for additional suffering and cruelty.

Twisting the intent like this is doing a disservice to the entire process. You can dislike capital punishment all you want, and I may even agree that it shouldn't be done, but the fact is, this statement is misleading at best. I'm all for a healthy discussion on it, but let's not conflate the issue with these misconceptions.

[-] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 10 months ago

I believe it was a mask with nitrogen.

[-] somtwo@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

That's my understanding as well. So since I don't see anyone else saying this in detail here goes:

I am not a biologist or a medical professional, but this is my understanding of the process.

The human body does not monitor blood oxygen levels. When you or I hold our breath, the feeling of urgent discomfort we feel is due to a rise in the carbon dioxide (more specifically the carbonic acid) in our blood. Inhaling pure nitrogen will still allow CO2 to exit the bloodstream, so if someone is not made aware of the fact that they are breathing pure nitrogen, they won't even know they are dying.

This person knew they were being executed, which I can only imagine induced a ton of stress and anxiety, yes. However, if you were to tell me that I was being executed tomorrow but I could pick which of the methods currently employed in the US I would be killed by, this would be at the top of the list.

If you want to argue that executing people is morally wrong and we should stop, sure, let's have that discussion. However, we don't need to characterize this method as more inhumane than others to do so.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (52 replies)
[-] squiblet@kbin.social 37 points 10 months ago

Sennett was found dead in her home March 18, 1988, with eight stab wounds in the chest and one on each side of her neck. Smith was one of two men convicted in the killing. The other, John Forrest Parker, was executed in 2010.

Prosecutors said they were each paid $1,000 to kill Sennett on behalf of her pastor husband, who was deeply in debt and wanted to collect on insurance.

[-] Naich@kbin.social 68 points 10 months ago

Yes, a complete barbarian. We have them too, but we aspire to be better than just being equally barbaric in return. That's why civilisations do justice, not revenge.

load more comments (62 replies)
[-] pugsnroses77@sh.itjust.works 27 points 10 months ago

even for 1988 thats not a huge chunk of money. poverty is the biggest driver of crime. imagine if we reinvested all the money we pour into prisons into actually taking care of people

[-] TheFriar@lemm.ee 21 points 10 months ago

Yeah, and you know what stuck out to me in the article? That the conservative justices said, he was “gaming the system” for too long with…appeals and requests for stays…and that justice wasn’t done until he was murdered.

Like…he was gaming the system by rotting in prison? So these arbiters of justice think justice is only an eye for an eye and these prisons they adore so much are not brutal enough?

[-] kibiz0r@midwest.social 16 points 10 months ago

Sounds like the husband killed her with his wallet. He wielded this guy like the guy wielded a knife.

It's absurd to think that killing him would really bring any more peace to the children than destroying the knife.

If anything, having to bear witness to endless appeals and proceedings for 35 years prolongs their torture. I'd really like to see a form of justice that focuses on ensuring the peace and stability of the victims and their family rather than the pain and suffering of the perpetrators.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] rbesfe@lemmy.ca 32 points 10 months ago

Better go after every hospital for "starving" patients before surgery

[-] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 10 months ago

love how we can murder criminals but if i want to murder myself legally, it's impossible.

Thanks guys, very cool.

[-] papertowels@lemmy.one 12 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

We're getting there.

A handful of states allow medical death with dignity.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[-] crumbtalk@lemmy.world 21 points 10 months ago

And this was after botching a first execution where the execution team had some questionable judgement

[-] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

This is what happens when education systems fail. They produce people who don't know what the hell they are talking about.

I'm assuming this person isn't intentionally trying to deceive.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2024
501 points (81.9% liked)

People Twitter

5295 readers
1658 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS