391
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by someguy3@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Fain “is a real ‘STIFF’ who is selling the Automobile Industry right into the big, powerful, hands of China,” Trump wrote Sunday night on Truth Social.

“He bought into Biden’s ‘vision’ of all Electric Vehicles...

top 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 206 points 9 months ago

Please, please, please let him start attacking blue-collar workers and unions.

[-] acceptable_pumpkin@lemmy.world 89 points 9 months ago

Sadly I don’t think that will change any of their minds. Remember his comments on his “preference” of military folks not to be captured? Still has tons of support from the military population.

[-] aew360@lemm.ee 54 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I read that Biden is more popular among active-duty soldiers but Trump is more popular among veterans. Which doesn’t make sense to me. Trump is a draft dodger and they think he’s the most badass President ever. All he did was golf and tweet. What the fuck

[-] AlternatePersonMan@lemmy.world 21 points 9 months ago

He cheats like a motherfucker at golf too. A decent book called President In Cheat details what an absolute loser he is on the green. His tweets are riddled with typos and nonsense. (My typos are okay because I don't have a PR team and I'm not a "stable genius")

The man is a failure at everything he does except getting away with lying and cheating- and it's not because he's a criminal mastermind. Yet so many people worship him. It boggles the mind.

[-] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 16 points 9 months ago

The possibility that Trump could win is hampering recruiting, to the point that the services are now dropping graduation/GED requirements.

[-] spider@lemmy.nz 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

but Trump is more popular among veterans.

...many of whom probably believe shit like this.

[-] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 9 months ago

But that’s different! We only hate those that we attempt to bar from serving!

[-] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago

We'll never convince the die-hards. But the moderates can be swayed.

[-] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 6 points 9 months ago

Yah, one only needs to swing the most moderate of one's opposing voters.

[-] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

And by-and-large, only to stay home. You don't have to vote for Biden, just don't vote for Trump.

[-] Twentytwodividedby7@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

Ok, math is hard, but lower turn out is the only way Trump wins. So you should vote and not wanting Trump to win means you should vote for Biden. Third party votes are unfortunately a waste and actually help Trump by lowering the hurdle to win a majority in the state.

[-] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Please look at the broader context of my statement here. I'm talking about getting people who were on the fence about Trump but would've potentially voted for him to stay home, because they aren't super happy about him insulting their profession.

Yes, for people who are reasonable and sensible. But for those who aren't, then yes, I think they should stay home.

[-] Kid_Thunder@kbin.social 45 points 9 months ago

Remember when Tucker Carlson's text messages were released and he called his fans 'especially dumb....cousin fuckers'? Remember when they still revered him anyway?

Trump could probably be at a rally in the deep south in a factory and call them all a bunch of good-for-nothing lazy losers and they'd still vote for him. They'd probably say "He speaks his mind and doesn't care what anyone including us thinks. He's so badass!" or like I've actually heard more than a few times "He says dumb things that I don't agree with but I agree with his politics" which is ridiculous but it doesn't matter.

[-] GladiusB@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

I don't remember anything Tucker ever said. His face perpetually told me "I am lying with anything I say" and I just ignored anything that ever spewed after.

[-] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 24 points 9 months ago

It's crazy to me how many of my union brothers are right wing and willingly vote for politicians that are openly anti union.

[-] theangryseal@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

I see the union guys in their maga hats in my store regularly.

I wonder if either they stumbled into their unions through family or if Trump is such a cultural phenomenon in rural America that they wear the hats to fit in around the homies and just don’t give much thought to politics. “I’ve been in this union through 4 Republican presidents and I still got my union. So what? Trump is cooo, he says what’s on his miiiiind. I like ‘at!”

[-] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world -3 points 9 months ago

Biden blocking the rail strike didn't help solve any of that sooooo...

[-] spider@lemmy.nz 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Unfortunately, this has been going on for decades.

see: Reagan Democrat

[-] TheBat@lemmy.world 22 points 9 months ago

"He's not talking about us."

[-] Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

Yep that is the thought process right there. It lets them shave off pieces till nothing is left

[-] Pratai@lemmy.ca 8 points 9 months ago

It’ll just make his coward base vote harder. They hate whatever he hates, even if it’s themselves.

[-] Ranvier@sopuli.xyz 106 points 9 months ago

If only he was president in the past we could have some kind of record to judge him on... Oh yeah, he was.

https://www.epi.org/publication/unprecedented-the-trump-nlrbs-attack-on-workers-rights/

Tldr: Filled the national labor relations board with appointees who worked to roll back workers rights and hamper unonization.

Can't imagine why unions aren't a fan of his /s

[-] doctorcrimson@lemmy.world 35 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Honestly can't even imagine why he ever thought those people might endorse him...

Dude must be senile af.

[-] GentlemanLoser@ttrpg.network 19 points 9 months ago

Remember the Carrier plant he "saved"?

[-] spider@lemmy.nz 3 points 9 months ago

Yes, I do:

Trump advertised Carrier's Dec. 1, 2016, announcement that it would preserve about 800 jobs in Indianapolis as a decisive break from decades of U.S. executives capitalizing on lower labor costs overseas at the expense of blue-collar workers at home.

Four years later, it has proved to be nothing of the sort.

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Remember that photo of him breaking ground at the foxconn megasite?

[-] maniacalmanicmania@aussie.zone 56 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Shawn Fain speaks at UAW 2024 National CAP Conference 1/22/24.

The UAW is calling on all unions to set their next contracts to expire on April 30, 2028 and for a general strike on May 1, 2028 to reclaim May Day.

[-] shiftenter@lemmy.world 44 points 9 months ago

It Could Happen Here recently published a podcast episode about how this would work. Some people are upset with how far out the date it set, but it's a smart approach and provides the runway necessary for other industries/unions to sign new contracts.

https://www.iheart.com/podcast/105-it-could-happen-here-30717896/episode/general-strike-with-kim-kelly-127675688/

[-] tjhart85@kbin.social 18 points 9 months ago

I'm a simple man, I see a Robert Evans podcast mentioned and I upvote.

Seriously though, it's good to see people thinking long term. We criticize the corps for only thinking of the next quarter (at the furthest) and then also criticize a guy with a well thought out long term plan?!

[-] maniacalmanicmania@aussie.zone 2 points 9 months ago

Thanks for this. I created a new post with a clip from the CAP conference and added the podcast link and summary. Should make it a bit easier to share the general strike call around.

[-] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 9 months ago

Fain is massively based

[-] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 52 points 9 months ago

selling the Automobile Industry right into the big, powerful, hands of China

This is the speech of a man who is very insecure about his hands. No normal person uses this vocabulary in this circumstance without some strong personal opinions on hands.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Look, his hands are massive for his developmental age, okay. Stop making fun of him for his hands. he's a toddler. those are some huge hands for a toddler.

[-] spirinolas@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

"They look like strong hands"

:(

[-] Enkrod@feddit.de 4 points 9 months ago

Neverending Story flashbacks

[-] scutiger@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Take my strong hand!

[-] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

No they don't.

He's no rockbiter.

[-] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 9 months ago

Does he drink a glass of water with both hands because they are weak or because he’s a toddler? We may never know.

[-] ohlaph@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

Did they shrink further?

[-] spider@lemmy.nz 42 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

In a scathing speech last week, Fain blasted Trump as a "scab" who if ever "worked in an auto plant, he wouldn't be a UAW member, he'd be a company man trying to squeeze the American worker."

Yep, he's a real champion of the little guy:

Donald Trump casts himself as a protector of workers and jobs, but a USA TODAY NETWORK investigation found hundreds of people – carpenters, dishwashers, painters, even his own lawyers – who say he didn't pay them for their work.

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Why pay people the wages they've earned, when you could not? /s

ETA: that's a royal "you," not directed at OP

[-] spider@lemmy.nz 6 points 9 months ago

With Trump, it works the same way as loyalty -- everyone owes him, but he doesn't owe them.

[-] RunningInRVA@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Man, I remember reading this article back in 2016. It stood out to me because it really exposed Trump for who he was pretty early on in all of this. It’s insane to think about all that has transpired since reading it.

[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago

Cry more. Worthless republican traitor swine.

[-] Aesculapius@kbin.social 7 points 9 months ago

Everything the man does is transactional. Support me and I'll support you (for a little while anyway). Fuck me and I fuck you

[-] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

The guy is 80. Let him talk his lungs off, he doesn't have much time.

[-] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

Let's hope that next big Mac is the straw that broke the camel's back

[-] Got_Bent@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

He's probably got plenty of time. That sweet, sweet presidential healthcare has every president since Ford making it into their nineties.

The catch is that those later years aren't necessarily coherent. That's the dangerous part with Trump.

this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2024
391 points (97.3% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2096 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS