0
Red Hat and the Clone Wars (dissociatedpress.net)
submitted 1 year ago by fruitywelsh@lemmy.ml to c/opensource@lemmy.ml
2 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://kbin.social/m/linux/t/91676

It’s been an exciting week for people who care about Linux distributions, FOSS licensing, FOSS distribution, FOSS business models, and the future of open source in general. Red Hat’s an…

top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] fruitywelsh@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

You are not entitled to a developer's works. If they choose to have you pay for the binaries and include the source with full rights preserved for what you can do with that source, they are providing FLOSS. RHEL after this is still doing better work for the Linux / Libre software space than Ubuntu is by trying to push for vendor lock via snaps in my mind.

[-] BrooklynMan@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

While I agree that nobody is entitled to the works of others, I find it both disingenuous and against the spirit of FOSS for Red Hat to lock its code behind a paywall just because it can still use the GPL due to some somewhat sneaky legal maneuvering so it can still call it "open source" by a very narrow technicality. At this point, why even bother? It's all just so slimy.

this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

Open Source

30349 readers
2313 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Cloak@lemmy.ml
kevincox@lemmy.ml
CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml
Lettuceeatlettuce@lemmy.ml