167
all 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Badeendje@lemmy.world 27 points 9 months ago

It would be good to start referring to the big C-suites as oligarchs. They amas abhorrent amounts of wealth and exert a lot of political power.. the term is very fitting.

[-] JimboDHimbo@lemmy.ca 15 points 9 months ago

Taylor Swift, Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, and Mark Zuckerberg are all oligarchs.

[-] blindbunny@lemmy.ml 20 points 9 months ago
[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago

Every single billionaire, most hectomillionaires and every politician with a net "worth" of over $10m.

[-] Zehzin@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

I appreciate a good SI prefix usage.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Thanks, I learned it from someone here on Lemmy after mistakenly using centi for years 😄

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 3 points 9 months ago

Yeah, hopefully most of us are at least centimillionaires.

[-] WalrusDragonOnABike@reddthat.com 3 points 9 months ago

Could have used centibillionaire or decamillionaire

[-] agitatedpotato@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Decamillionaire sounds like it should be a verb, or maybe im just too hopeful.

[-] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago

I know it's trendy to dunk on Taylor Swift, but what is she an oligarch of? She plays music for people that want to pay for her and doesn't exert any more political power than telling people to vote.

She's not close to the same league of the others you listed, who exert real political influence on Congress and the people.

[-] JimboDHimbo@lemmy.ca -2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

The whole "she's a billionaire" status is influence in and of it's self, doesn't need to be political, in my opinion.

Edit: actually, it's in the definition that an oligarch would have to have a large amount of political power. My bad, lol.

I would argue that she gained political power when she suggested that her fans should register to vote on social media (which is a good thing). I would also back that argument with the notion that Fox and/or right wing media being worried that Swift might endorse a president that isn't the orange Hershey squirt, is evidence of political power as well.

[-] dtjones@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Not a swifty but if she wasn't a billionaire, I don't think she would have less "political power." She is just that popular. I think the distinction between swift and your run-of-the-mill oligarch is that they specifically use their money and power to expand their political power (e.g., buying political party members, burying any dissenters). Could she do that? Probably, and that in and of itself is problematic. I think that this is maybe what you were saying though.

[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago

That is one tacky illustration.

[-] idiomaddict@feddit.de 9 points 9 months ago

Honestly, if they’d just gotten a tiny figurine Statue of Liberty, then actually put it in a matryoshka doll, it would have been better, but it looks like shitty photoshop

this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2024
167 points (96.6% liked)

politics

19159 readers
4538 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS