208
addition rule (lemmy.world)
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world 83 points 1 year ago

Mathematicians write the most insane shit you've ever seen in your life then they're just like □ peace out

[-] bonus_crab@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

If you wrote the equivalent of this in software I think linus torvalds himself would personally show up to destroy your pc.

[-] Aqarius@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Nah, formulas like that are basically the assembly code for logic.

[-] slampisko@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago

statements dreamed up by the utterly deranged

[-] Sasha@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 1 year ago

OP, I need the definition for × and <,> too

[-] affiliate@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

× is the cartesian product and = {x, {x,y}} is the ordered pair of x and y. (i.e., if x is in X and y is in Y, then is the corresponding element of the cartesian product X × Y). hope this helps

[-] rasensprenger@feddit.de 12 points 1 year ago

What does type() mean here?

[-] affiliate@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

it's the "order type" of a well ordering on a set. so, given a set X with a total ordering R, type(X,R) is the unique ordinal isomorphic to (X,R)

[-] bort@feddit.de 11 points 1 year ago

what's with the square at the end? isn't that usually for proofs?

[-] affiliate@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

yeah but sometimes when the textbook authors are feeling particularly mischievous they'll just put them in random places. and sometimes they'll even skip the proofs but keep the square.

[-] Lemjukes@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

Give it up for op actually out here answering questions like a real live teacher.

[-] Sasha@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago

Oh wow, I should know that... Thanks

[-] JackRiddle@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

× is the cartesian product I think, no clue what the other thing is tho

[-] Pretzilla@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago
[-] hips_and_nips@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

This is giving me PTSD flashbacks from Number Theory at uni. What a fascinating mindfuck.

[-] affiliate@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

oh god number theory.... the things they make you do in that class.......

[-] yetAnotherUser@feddit.de 10 points 1 year ago
[-] riodoro1@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Im sorry, but the capital form alone justifies its existence.

[-] Ragdoll_X@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Is this from Principia Mathematica or smth?

[-] Sop@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 year ago

This looks like classical ordinal set theory in relatively modern notation. I’d guess that Principia Mathematica uses batshit notation compared to this but I haven’t read it.

this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2024
208 points (100.0% liked)

196

17462 readers
814 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS