Am I the only one thinking social media apps shouldn't be on a work device anyway, unless you're part of their social media team?
Not without some intent and effort :D But shit's blurred, because some use social media in their workplace communications for some reason. InfoSec is too hard of a concept for many.
Tiktok scans your clipboard. If there is any confidential stuff you want to copy, pls don't use Tiktok.
...don’t use Tiktok.
I agree completely.
I don't use TikTok, and there are a ton of reasons to be concerned about sending massive amounts of data to corporations, especially when they're state associated, but a very large amount of apps scan your clipboard.
Have you ever had an app text you a one time use code, and automatically input it? That app scans your clipboard. Facebook, Instagram, X, all scan your clipboard.
I see this brought up a lot and it just seems like the wrong argument against TikTok.
All of those are espionage channels for unaccountable, non-democratic organisations with a history of interfering with democracies and funding coups. All should be considered equally malicious.
It doesn't show any more private than Facebook, Instagram and X. Also you should aware that you are mixing up a legitimate usecase of the clipboard than a more malicious usecase. Tiktok also repeatedly scans the clipboard instead of a one time thing for SMS codes.
I Don't use tiktok but that is wild...
All of your apps do that. It's not something exclusive to tiktok. There are plenty of other reasons to ban it, though.
Android sends alerts if an app reads data from your clipboard.
this is good
banning all major social media from city owned devices would be better
TikTok is a massive confidentiality hazard, but the only major difference between it and facebook is who its sending a live feed of every click, step and toilet break to
this is normal. work devices are never for personal use.
Good. I'm surprised that all governments havn't banned this chinese spyware.
Here are some problems with the "why would you use any social media on a work device?"
Social media outreach. The government needs to talk to people where they are for public information campaigns. This includes social media as well as traditional media
What constitutes "work device" is being broadly interpreted. So broadly that it also includes your personal device if you do any kind of "work" on it. I can vouch for this personally on a federal project. This not only means "don't install social on work devices", but "don't install socials on personal devices unless you delete email, slack, and any other means by which you might work. This is a huge violation of privacy. Of course I can just say "fuck you, no work on my BYOD", which I have, but now I'm at a performance disadvantage with my peers. I could also say "buy me a phone", which I have; but they won't.
Just because you don't use/don't like TikTok it doesn't mean that's where this slippery slope ends. What's next? No personal use of queer dating apps? Why not
With any BYOD policy, the organization is accepting the risk of what may come on a personally owned device. Carving out an exception for a single application is a very clear anti-pattern of security.
They could just have a designated device for the social media team that they could use.
The article specifically says this is not permitted.
1.) its usually a single persons job to do "social media outreach", not most of the employees
2.) People shouldn't be using their personal devices to do government work, period.
3.) slippery slope? why would someone use queer dating apps on their GOVERNMENT device? this is a stupid argument
4.) This is about GOVERNMENT, not private business. You are conflating the two.
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.