390
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by someguy3@lemmy.ca to c/general@lemmy.world

This only makes sense when I realize that to conservatives, it's an identity. They think it's an identity that Taylor Swift should have because she's (presumably) white, popular, rich, good looking, Midwestern, Christian, etc.

To them politics is not about ideas, or policies, or problem solving, or good governance. It's all about identity.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Okokimup@lemmy.world 119 points 1 year ago

The real identity politics were the Conservatives we met along the way.

[-] DigitalTraveler42@lemmy.world 93 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I've heard this same thing said to me by Hitler humpers trying to recruit me based on what I look like, just because we're blonde haired and blue eyed with fair skin does not make us want to be a part of their hateful bullshit.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 53 points 1 year ago

Anti racists come in all shapes, sizes, and colors. That’s kinda the fucking point actually.

[-] DigitalTraveler42@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

Abso-fucking-lutely.

[-] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Damn right.

[-] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

"But you would be part of the in-group! So why don't you help us make the out-groups life miserable?!"

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 48 points 1 year ago

Well yeah, to them it’s a tribe instead of a moral failing

[-] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Right, and so many don't seem to understand the difference between principles and affiliation. It's why when they respond to allegations about Trump being associated with Epstein by saying Bill Clinton was too, they're dumbfounded when liberals say, okay, he should be investigated too.

Generally, liberals are more likely to relate to things based on principles (e.g., people shouldn't have sex with children, so we should investigate any credible allegations regardless of who they're about). Conservatives are more likely to relate to things based on affiliation (e.g., I reject the allegations about that guy having sex with children because he's on my team, but the guy on your team should be investigated). That's why Al Franken isn't in office anymore, even though he was more guilty of an appearance of wrongdoing more than actual wrongdoing.

[-] Treczoks@lemm.ee 33 points 1 year ago

I don't know much about Taylor Swift, but I assume she is simply too smart to be conservative.

[-] Tyfud@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago
[-] nottelling@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

The problem is that plenty of smart people are conservative. Because conservatism is fundamentally a grift, and the smart ones use the dumb ones to get richer.

Swift just has enough empathy to realize she's already rich.

[-] stoly@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Yep. Important to separate social and fiscal conservatives. Those Gays for Trump and Blacks for Trump types are fiscal conservatives who hope that the social conservatives will consider them "one of the good ones".

[-] scottywh@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

That's true.

The smart ones are just evil.

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 28 points 1 year ago

It does seem true that many hyper wealthy people trend fiscally conservative, surprise surprise, to guard their own wealth.

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Well-off entertainers seem to swing a little more left. Not sure what the ratio is compared to other wealthy people, there absolutely are plenty of conservative entertainers. I think quite a few of them spent time being poor while trying to win the fame lottery, and of course SAG and other unions are big in the entertainment world.

Anyway, not a huge surprise Swift is left leaning. The ones that are a bigger shocker are people like Garth Brooks or especially some of Dale Earnhardt’s progressive views.

[-] kandoh@reddthat.com 6 points 1 year ago

Entertainment requires a lot of traveling and contact with lots of different people. That lends itself to leftwing viewpoints and thinking.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 27 points 1 year ago

You think any given political bloc isn't mostly made up of people that think it's an identity? If so, you're lucky to not have run into it.

Frankly, most people stick with whatever they are raised with, and that's that. There's just as many blind, inherited democrats as republicans in the US. Most people don't even understand the policy platform of their party, much less bother to challenge the correctness of it for themselves.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 21 points 1 year ago

American “conservatives” are actually radicals by this point.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

That's putting it mildly.

[-] Theprogressivist@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

It's all they have, honestly. Poor pathetic things.

[-] fsxylo@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 year ago

Ms private jet is performatively liberal at best.

[-] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah, but that seems in line with the Democratic party leadership.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago

You have an internet connection, so you're performatively liberal at best too. You don't even think about people that can't afford an internet connection, how can you be on the left?

In fact everyone on the internet is performative. That's what everything on here is, someone's performance. You could be Jeff Bezos for all anyone knows.

[-] stoly@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

LOL the idea that you should automatically be conservative because of wealth. They assume that everyone is just as selfish and unempathetic as they are.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 year ago

Honestly, I understand what he means. She's from a stupid rich family and grew up surrounded by country music influences. Statistically speaking, she probably would be a conservative.

[-] kandoh@reddthat.com 5 points 1 year ago

The higher the population moves up Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs, the fewer conservatives in the population.

[-] mightyfoolish@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I know I mentioned this a few days ago but some anonymous person on reddit said something like this a few years ago:

They [implying white supremacists] are just mad she doesn’t want to be their blue eyed goddess spokesperson

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2024
390 points (93.5% liked)

General Discussion

13294 readers
36 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy.World General!

This is a community for general discussion where you can get your bearings in the fediverse. Discuss topics & ask questions that don't seem to fit in any other community, or don't have an active community yet.


🪆 About Lemmy World


🧭 Finding CommunitiesFeel free to ask here or over in: !lemmy411@lemmy.ca!

Also keep an eye on:

For more involved tools to find communities to join: check out Lemmyverse!


💬 Additional Discussion Focused Communities:


Rules and Policies

Remember, Lemmy World rules also apply here.0. See: Rules for Users.

  1. No bigotry: including racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  2. Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. Be thoughtful and helpful: even with ‘silly’ questions. The world won’t be made better by dismissive comments to others on Lemmy.
  4. Link posts should include some context/opinion in the body text when the title is unaltered, or be titled to encourage discussion.
  5. Posts concerning other instances' activity/decisions are better suited to !fediverse@lemmy.world or !lemmydrama@lemmy.world communities.
  6. No Ads/Spamming.
  7. No NSFW content.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS