277
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by jordanlund@lemmy.one to c/politics@lemmy.world

This is for the 1/6 trial in Washington D.C.

If you're trying to keep track of where we're at in the Trump prosecutions:

Updated 8/17/2023

Georgia
13 state felonies
Election Interference
Investigation
Indictment - <- You Are Here
Arrest - Defendants have until noon, Friday, 8/25 to surrender voluntarily.
Trial - Fani Willis requested a trial date of 3/4/2024, one day before Super Tuesday. 21 days before the current trial date in the New York case.
Conviction
Sentencing

Washington, D.C.
4 federal felonies
January 6th Election Interference
Investigation
Indictment
Arrest <- You Are Here
(DOJ has requested a trial date of 1/2/2024
Trump lawyers have requested April, 2026.
The judge will announce a final date on 8/28/2023)
Trial
Conviction
Sentencing

New York
34 state felonies
Stormy Daniels Payoff
Investigation
Indictment
Arrest <- You Are Here
Trial - March 25th, 2024
Conviction
Sentencing

Florida
40 federal felonies
Top Secret Documents charges
Investigation
Indictment
Original indictment was for 37 felonies.
3 new felonies were added on July 27, 2023.
Arrest <- You Are Here
Trial - May 20, 2024
Conviction
Sentencing

Other grand juries, such as for the documents at Bedminster, have not been announced.

The E. Jean Carroll trial for sexual assault and defamation where Trump was found liable and ordered to pay $5 million before immediately defaming her again resulting in a demand for $10 million is not listed as it's a civil case and not a crimimal one. That trial date is currently set for January 15th, the same day as the Iowa caucus.

top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] jordanlund@lemmy.one 85 points 1 year ago

Judge is announcing it on 8/28... but I'd love for her to just go:

"Defense makes a strong case for 4/2026. I'm setting that date and remanding defendant into custody until that date.

Please note, you can get what you want and still not be entirely happy."

[-] capt_wolf@lemmy.world 81 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'd love that, if I was ever on the hook for almost 100 high-end felony charges, I could just be like "Wait, time out! I have things I want to do first!" and expect the judge to be like "You know what? You go have fun! Play some golf! Run for president! You just take all the time you need, sweetie!"

You can bet your ass that any of us common schlubs would be rotting in a maximum security facility where you can't take a piss without being watched by a security camera and 5 guards and have a slightly less than assured chance of getting Epsteined before your court date.

"Rules for thee! Not for me!"

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Pretty sure he has to actually run for president for it to fly.

Which is tedious. Personally, I imagine it’s a lot easier to just not be a felonious idiot.

[-] donuts@kbin.social 62 points 1 year ago

Fine by me.

Let's lock him up in a holding cell while he awaits his trial, just to be safe.

[-] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

The day that I see Trump in handcuffs is the day I'll be opening a nice bottle of champagne with dinner. Same goes for the day it's confirmed that he's ineligible for running for office again and the day he receives a prison sentence.

The day that I see Trump in handcuffs is the day I'll be opening a nice bottle of champagne with dinner.

We're up to 4 Trump Indictment Days in our house. Don't wait, they're all special occasions.

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

You celebrate Indictmas too?

I'm looking forward to St. Verdict's Day and Jailsgiving too!

[-] ivanafterall@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Well-done steak with ketchup, just like Donnie likes it.

[-] blue_zephyr@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Unfortunately there's nothing preventing him from running for president out of prison. God forbid if you're a disgusting foreigner, but trying to overthrow the government in the highest act of treason since the civil war? Nah, go ahead mister president.

[-] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

We'll see. I won't pretend to know much of anything about the law, but I saw a news article about some lawyers who recently concluded that an article of the 14th amendment actually does prevent him from holding office.

And yeah, on paper the law applies to everyone but clearly that's far from the truth. Seems like Trump's consequences are finally starting to catch up with him though.

[-] arensb@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

The "no rebels or insurrectionists in office" clause? That only takes effect of he's actually convicted. And then, of course, he'll ignore the court ruling, whine about persecution, appeal the case, and continue doing whatever the duck he wants until he's physically restrained.

[-] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah I think that's the one. He might be convicted soon, I think. I hope.

[-] bauhaus@lemmy.ml 44 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Ninety-one felony indictments in four cases in three states and Washington, DC. And forty of them are either for or are related to espionage.

Wow.

[-] charliespider@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago

Ironic.

The guy being charged with election interference doesn't want the court cases to interfere with his campaigning in the next election.

[-] Gatsby@discuss.online 33 points 1 year ago

If he didn't want multiple criminal trials to interfere with his political ambitions then perhaps he shouldn't have committed all those felonies?

Yes, but in his defense, he never thought he'd get caught or have to face consequences for anything ever.

[-] thesprongler@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

I agree, there's a whole new election for him to interfere with.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 15 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


WASHINGTON — Former President Donald Trump, the front-runner in polls for the 2024 Republican nomination, is seeking to delay his federal trial on charges related to his efforts to stop the peaceful transfer of power and retain the White House following his 2020 election loss.

The incumbent administration has targeted its primary political opponent—and leading candidate in the upcoming presidential election—with criminal prosecution," Trump's attorneys wrote.

In a filing last week, Smith's team requested that jury selection begin in December and that the trial start just after the holiday break, on Jan. 2, 2024.

That date, senior assistant special counsel Molly Gaston wrote, "would vindicate the public’s strong interest in a speedy trial—an interest guaranteed by the Constitution and federal law in all cases, but of particular significance here, where the defendant, a former president, is charged with conspiring to overturn the legitimate results of the 2020 presidential election, obstruct the certification of the election results, and discount citizens’ legitimate votes."

Trump had telegraphed a plan to delay the trial until after the 2024 election and has said that he will try to have the case moved out of Washington, D.C., even though that's where most of his alleged criminal activity took place.

"The appropriate way to identify and address those biases is through careful voir dire that asks, among other things, whether prospective jurors can 'lay aside [their] impression[s] or opinion[s] and render a verdict based on the evidence presented in court.'"


I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] chalupapocalypse@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Great summary, thanks!

[-] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

So they are hoping he dies before the trial. Bold move cotton, let's see how it plays out.

[-] xc2215x@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

He knows he cannot win.

this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2023
277 points (96.0% liked)

politics

19145 readers
1955 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS