153
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] jaden@partizle.com 2 points 1 year ago

I'm typically a swing voter, but not anymore

[-] Randy_Bobandy@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Who here still thinks republicans should be allowed to vote and hold elected office and write and pass laws?

Show of hands?

Great, everyone who raised their hand deserves this shit. Everyone wants to hate on Republicans, but when it comes to the voting booth, everyone defends them to the death. Well this is what you get. But DeMoCrAcY is more important than anything and everything, right?

[-] stown@sedd.it 1 points 1 year ago

Come on, you play right into their bullshit propaganda with that message. If they go low we don't stoop to their level. We do not win elections by removing voting rights for those we disagree with - that is an authoritarian tactic.

[-] BunkerBusterKeaton@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

there isn't really any 'nobility' in 'taking the high road' while marginalized communities continue to get owned and killed. Trans kids are being targeted, women are being targeted, BIPOC are being targeted.

what good is civility? authoritarian leftism is the only way to get results

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] wwaxwork@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Friendly reminder Biden lost the battle but he hasn't lost the war. He is currently working out an income related savings plan and doing a hail mary long shot roundabout come in the back door play using the Authority he has from the Higher Education Act to create debt forgiveness regulation. He's still out there trying, though anything through the Dept of Education will take a while because of how policy works there.

[-] derf82@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

A very poor application of standing doctrine. Kagan cuts right to the heart of it when she asks "Where is MOHELA" as well as if anyone honestly thinks Missouri is there over MOHELA losing some fees. Heck, MOHELA wanted nothing to do with the suit and that the payments Missouri claimed MOHELA made back actually were never paid.

Then the recurrence of the "major questions doctrine," this invented idea that lets them throw out the plain text when they disagree.

That said, I did disagree with the plan. It was poorly targeted, hitting wealthier grads that still had loans, while ignoring poor people that never went in the first place, or were frugal and had limited loans. As someone that saw the Great Recession hit just after graduation, I wonder where my relief was from that emergency, as my lifetime earning took a massive hit, all while still having to pay my loans, with not so much as a payment pause or interest forbearance. To me, it was a thinly veiled attempt to buy votes for the midterm. Had it any other goal, Biden wouldn't have waited so long.

[-] minorsecond@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I don't understand how someone can sue over someone else being harmed. Doesn't the person or entity suing have to be directly harmed in order to sue?

[-] Ado@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yep, they upended the standing doctrine that requires you to be the party injured to sue the party causing the injury. But also these aren't true judges, they're political advocates. They will uphold standing doctrine where they see fit, and strike it down where they don't like here.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2023
153 points (98.1% liked)

World News

32349 readers
604 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS