Israeli troops gun down thousands of Palestinians awaiting aid in north Gaza (thecradle.co)

submitted 8 months ago by MakunaHatata@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

8 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Tel Aviv has stepped up indiscriminate attacks against displaced Palestinians in northern Gaza due to the army's failure to 'dismantle' Hamas

top 8 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] Arete@lemmy.world 17 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Many of the casualties in the chaos that erupted in Gaza at a food distribution site were killed as a result of aid trucks ramming people as people tried to escape Israeli fire, according to a local journalist in Gaza, Khadeer Al Za'anoun.

Al Za'anoun, who was at the scene and witnessed the incident, told CNN that, though there were large crowds waiting for food to be distributed from aid trucks, the chaos and confusion that led to trampling only started once Israeli soldiers opened fire.

"Most of the people that were killed were rammed by the aid trucks during the chaos and while trying to escape the Israeli gunfire," he said.

He said that around 20 were killed directly by the gunfire, and the rest were killed under the aid trucks' wheels.

CNN says 20 people were shot, triggering a stampede that killed a lot more. Where did this site get "thousands"?

[-] Altofaltception@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Firing into a crowd of thousands*

The number of casualties is going to be different.

[-] Arete@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago

The title is "guns down thousands". That means directly shoots thousands, not 20 in a giant crowd.

[-] Altofaltception@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Fine.

Doesn't change the fact that Israel shot at a crowd of starving people.

[-] OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago

Yeah, like the truth is bad enough. Why embellish it? That helps no one.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago

Article is being reported for the headline reading "guns down thousands" while the actual death toll is far, far less than that.

Here's the thing...

Israel ABSOLUTELY opened fire on a crowd of thousands of innocent civilians with ZERO regard for their health or safety. The fact that thousands weren't killed and that it was merely hundreds IS NOT BETTER.

I'm not going to get into a debate over headline semantics.

The story is confirmed, the number of casualties is fluctuating, and Israel needs to be ashamed of this event.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/israel-gaza-hamas-war-humanitarian-aid-death-toll-over-30000/

"at least 104 people were killed and more than 750 others wounded."

https://www.msn.com/en-ph/news/other/israeli-troops-fire-on-gaza-crowd-at-aid-point-104-killed/ar-BB1j71h5

"killing at least 104 people and wounding over 700"

https://www.cnn.com/2024/02/29/middleeast/gaza-city-deaths-food-israel-intl/index.html

"104 were killed and more than 700 injured"

[-] jet@hackertalks.com 4 points 8 months ago

When the headline is distorted, and a practical lie, it does a disservice to your message. And in fact makes other sources less credible overall in the media landscape.

This applies to this current genocide, as well as any other media event. People are not dumb, when they see the headline and open the article, they will internalize the distortion. And then when they see future headlines they will interpret it through that lens.

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 1 points 8 months ago

While that is true, the distortion is still far less than with every pro-Israel piece of text I've seen recently.

One could say that when you are on the right side, lies impede you, but in fact people are dumb, including people writing headlines. They sometimes think that imitating their adversary is a good thing.

this post was submitted on 29 Feb 2024

3 points (52.9% liked)

World News

39112 readers

877 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.