154
submitted 2 years ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

A Texas county has launched a first-of-its-kind criminal investigation into waste management giant Synagro over PFAS-contaminated sewage sludge it is selling to Texas farmers as a cheap alternative to fertilizer.

Two small Texas ranches at the center of that case have also filed a federal lawsuit against Synagro, alleging the company knew its sludge was contaminated but still sold it. Sludge spread on a nearby field sickened the farmers, killed livestock, polluted drinking water, contaminated beef later sold to the public and left their properties worthless, the complaint alleges.

The PFAS levels independent testing found on the farm were “shockingly high”, said Kyla Bennett, policy director for the Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility nonprofit, which is assisting in the analyses.

The farms’ drinking water was found to be contaminated at levels over 65m times higher than the federal health advisory for PFOS, one kind of PFAS compound, a Guardian calculation indicates, and meat was as much as 250,000 times above safe levels, the lawsuit alleges.

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 46 points 2 years ago

Putting to the side the huge problem that this practice isn't regulated out of existence yet, it's curious how this keeps happening again and again even after these events have been in the news for a while now. Then it occurred to me that perhaps that news doesn't make it on Fox. 🥺

[-] ki77erb@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago

Probably because a lot of Farmers are historically conservative and adamantly against many forms of government regulation. When situations like this arise, I imagine them throwing up there hands and asking "How can something like this be allowed to happen??"

[-] WeeSheep@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

But the only people who care are those directly affected. The rest are in the not my problem part of conservatives.

[-] nac82@lemm.ee 44 points 2 years ago

Imagine that, buying cheap sludge from a waste plant in an unregulated capitalist state had negative outcomes?

Wow!

[-] STOMPYI@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yea, they ~~aren't victims they're~~ victims and morons. Momma always said not to buy unregulated sludge and apply it to all your assets without independent testing. Momma knew her shit.

[-] Mac@mander.xyz 3 points 2 years ago

Morons are still victims whether justified or not.

[-] STOMPYI@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago
[-] Supermariofan67@programming.dev 7 points 2 years ago

The capitalist owner class wants you to blame the victims, like you just did.

[-] nac82@lemm.ee 11 points 2 years ago

I dont pity Texas for making Texas what it has become. I lived there for 25+ years, and those victims endorse the system that crushes them. They would defend Abott and Paxton with violence from the criminal charges they flee so desperately.

[-] motor_spirit@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Eh, more like accurately highlighted the systematic issue

[-] ivanafterall@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

You can't cheap out on your sludge. You don't have to buy the overpriced European sludges that charge for the brand name, but at least find a local artisan that does small-batch sludges.

[-] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

Why is the PFAS level so high in the sludge? Is it just from concentration? Or is there a factory dumping something into the wastewater?

[-] ivanafterall@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago

There really is a market for everything. Why am I poor!?

"SEWER SLUDGE! GET YOUR DISCOUNT SEWER SLUDGE!"

this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2024
154 points (99.4% liked)

News

36642 readers
555 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS