submitted 8 months ago by stopthatgirl7@kbin.social to c/technology@lemmy.world

5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Futurism report highlights the reputational cost of publishing AI-generated content.

top 5 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] Toes@ani.social 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

CNET has been spam for a long time

[-] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

Any news site using Chatbots to right their articles should not be trusted.

[-] jet@hackertalks.com 5 points 8 months ago

Wait.. is Wikipedia publishing original research?!?!??!

[-] CaptainBasculin@lemmy.ml 3 points 8 months ago

Are these the people behind #1 malware site download.com? lmao should've been done ages ago

[-] drawerair@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I learned that Wikipedia has a "reliable sources" table thanks to this. I'll check it out.

I can't recall a time when I went to Cnet to read re tech. I get tech stuff from Youtube and Verge.

The Wikipedia folks didn't demote Cnet after 1 week of discussion. Not 1 month. Not 6 months. Were they giving Cnet time to change for the better?

this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2024

72 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

58999 readers

4214 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS