162
top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] thefartographer@lemm.ee 43 points 8 months ago

By denying, derailing, delaying, and deflecting meaningful discussions around the sector’s key issues, the agriculture industry is using the same tactics as the tobacco and fossil fuel lobbies.

And sugar. We fought these same battles with sugar and made giant steps but most of the damage that was done will continue plaguing the next couple of generations. Don't let meat and dairy do the same to those generations.

[-] puchaczyk@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 8 months ago

They are already doing that with prpagandists like Nina Teicholz.

[-] Shake747@lemmy.dbzer0.com 34 points 8 months ago

"Misleading Ads, funding experts, lobbying opinions"

This is also just every large industry/corporation ever

[-] Rom@hexbear.net 17 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

It is 1933. The lead industry is lying about the dangers of their product.

It is 1953. The tobacco industry is lying about the dangers of their product.

It is 1967. The sugar industry is lying about the dangers of their product.

It is 1977. The oil industry is lying about the dangers of their product.

It is 1993. The dairy industry is lying about the dangers of their product.

It is 2024. The meat industry is lying about the dangers of their product.

manhattan

[-] leaky_shower_thought@feddit.nl 11 points 8 months ago

go, go product dangers!

...Mighty morphin' product dangers~

[-] ryannathans@aussie.zone 2 points 8 months ago
[-] Dangy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 8 months ago

Search up "dairy is scary" on your favorite video hosting site

[-] ryannathans@aussie.zone -4 points 8 months ago

Lmao this garbage is vegan extremist propaganda, I have been to dairy farms, I know people that own and work in dairy farms, this video just shows the worst cases of abuse and portrays it as normal. It doesn't even follow basic reason, like why artificially inseminate all these cows when a bull works just fine? All these clips of people assaulting and dragging cows around portrayed as normal? Seriously? Even abatoirs have animal wellbeing officers these days

[-] naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 8 months ago

So extreme, not wanting to treat feeling beings as property and kill them.

The most extreme of extremism

[-] redhydride@lemmy.ml 9 points 8 months ago

It's kinda naive to think that they're not employing those tactics. Every coorporation/industry uses them.

[-] Coasting0942@reddthat.com 5 points 8 months ago

Hundreds of million dollars in ad/lobbying can basically be factored into the cost of doing business

[-] naturalgasbad@lemmy.ca 8 points 8 months ago

It's specifically the beef industry, which is simultaneously a huge source of methane emissions, a huge land user for cattle ranching, worse for human health, and, coincidentally, a significant US agricultural output.

[-] shreddy_scientist@lemmy.ml 7 points 8 months ago

While beef is a big aspect of the overall agricultural industry, cattle feed requires roughly 3/4 of all US grown crops. Meaning with less beef consumption, the total US agricultural output would increase. But veggies aren't subsidized to the same extent as beef and corporations value profit over everything.

[-] FriendBesto@lemmy.ml 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

But we do need meat to survive. There are a number of nutrients we cannot get from plants. Including among them B12. Maybe fish then?

Well let's fact check this:

https://www.ars.usda.gov/news-events/news/research-news/2019/study-clarifies-us-beefs-resource-use-and-greenhouse-gas-emissions/

"The seven regions' combined beef cattle production accounted for 3.3 percent of all U.S. GHG emissions (By comparison, transportation and electricity generation together made up 56 percent of the total in 2016 and agriculture in general 9 percent)"

3.3% of total USA emissions? In what planet is less 3.3% huge? I would say that we need food over lots of others industries. Also, apparently if you feed cattle seaweed, it reduces emissions. At about 1/4 I have read between 1/5 to 1/3. Look it up, this article says 80%+ which seems too high.

https://phys.org/news/2021-03-seaweed-supplements-livestock-methane-emissions.html

Anyway, what about rich people, Bill Gates, Bezos, movie stars and politicians using private jets everywhere on a whim? How come that never really gets touched on or heaviy pushed in the news media? Which clearly use at least about the same or more per capita. What about something as wasteful as the cruise ship industry?

How bad are cruise ships for the environment?

https://theweek.com/environmental-news/1024392/how-the-cruise-industry-is-pivoting-to-sustainability

Traditional diesel-powered cruise ships pump out massive quantities of toxic emissions, experts say. While the entire shipping industry emits "2.9% of globalcarbon dioxide emissions," cruise ships "produce more carbon dioxide annually on average than any other kind of ship due to their air conditioning, heated pools and other hotel amenities," The Associated Press reported, citing a study from the European Federation for Transport and Environment.

It seems weird that people do not focus on this but on an actual food source. We do not need cruise ships and crazy private jets as mich as we need food. Not to say that Big corps are not assholes, big pharma, big oil, big sugar, all are, among others.

[-] nkat2112@sh.itjust.works 6 points 8 months ago

Thank you for posting this. It's good to be aware of that.

[-] dessalines@lemmy.ml 6 points 8 months ago
[-] peter@feddit.uk 2 points 8 months ago

I'm fairly certain PETA is funded by the meat industry to discredit animal rights activists

this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2024
162 points (98.2% liked)

World News

32327 readers
624 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS