430
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

That was one of the more interesting SOTU addresses I've seen. Personally, I think he said most of the things that needed to be said, and he said them reasonably well. I'm sure he's going to get some flack for attacking Trump directly (though not by name), but I was frankly glad to see it. Doing otherwise makes it seem like it's just your typical election/political disagreements, but we're past that now.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 177 points 8 months ago

He really needed to expose the lie of "Sleepy Joe" and he absolutely did. Anyone who honestly thought he has mental deficiencies just got their ass handed to them by an 81 year old.

[-] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.world 96 points 8 months ago

Agreed, he seemed on top of it the whole time, including while responding to the heckles. A few times he flubbed up his words a bit, but that's been true forever. He's not the orator Obama is, but it was and excellent speech.

[-] GardenVarietyAnxiety@lemmy.world 87 points 8 months ago

Right? Dude -overcame- a speech impediment ffs.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 37 points 8 months ago

Speech impediment + talking way too fast, but he recognized the problem in speaking slowly.

[-] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 24 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

He's not the orator Obama is

No one is, and that's just the truth. Obama will probably go down as the most effective public speaker we'll see in our lifetime.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] suction@lemmy.world 24 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Waiiiit whaaaat, he's 81? No fucking way, that seals it, I'm not going to vote /s

[-] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 27 points 8 months ago

Yeah but the other guy is 277.

Oh, we're talking age, not weight?

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (42 replies)
[-] Bobmighty@lemmy.world 87 points 8 months ago

As everyone starts dunking on the trolls, remember that a non zero number of them are less trolls and more agents of chaos for their government. Reporting and down voting might be a much more useful action.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 86 points 8 months ago

From the SotU

Here’s a simple truth. You can’t love your country only when you win.

Nice.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 78 points 8 months ago

Congressional Republican leaders showcased one of their newest lawmakers through the State of the Union rebuttal, hoping to make a generational contrast with Biden. Alabama Sen. Katie Britt, the youngest Republican woman elected to the Senate, painted a picture of a nation that “seems to be slipping away” and one where “our families are hurting.”

“Right now, our commander-in-chief is not in command. The free world deserves better than a dithering and diminished leader,” Britt said, speaking deliberately in an address from her home kitchen.

Dithering and diminished? You just got your clock cleaned by an old guy and you're stumping for the convicted fraud who can't remember who is currently the President? The one who thinks magnets are somehow turned off by water? The one who declares loudly they'll change the state name of Pennsylvania if he doesn't get enough votes? That one?

Katie Britt, I didn't have any expectations - never heard of you before - but whoever wrote that for you stuck you in the woodchipper. Do better. Stop supporting a demented rapist. Stop destroying the rights of women to their own bodies.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 69 points 8 months ago

I would guess that was higher energy than Republicans expected. But, people always underestimate Joe.

[-] CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world 24 points 8 months ago

Exaggerating Biden’s mental fitness day after day is a double-edged sword, since in moments like this he can blow away expectations

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[-] gmtom@lemmy.world 53 points 8 months ago

The troll farm accounts are out in full force today.

[-] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.world 33 points 8 months ago

It was a nice little period when they hadn't discovered lemmy.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 24 points 8 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


WASHINGTON (AP) — President Joe Biden delivered a defiant argument for a second term in his State of the Union speech Thursday night, lacing into GOP front-runner Donald Trump for espousing “resentment, revenge and retribution” and for jeopardizing freedom at home and abroad.

Reveling in the political moment, Biden fired multiple broadsides at “my predecessor” without ever mentioning Trump by name — 13 times in all — raising his voice repeatedly as he worked to quell voter concerns about his age and job performance while sharpening the contrast with his all-but-certain November rival.

White House aides said Biden was aiming to prove his doubters wrong by flashing his combative side and trying to needle Republicans over positions he believes are out of step with the country, particularly on access to abortion, but also tax policy and healthcare.

Biden aides inside the White House and on his campaign had hoped for some fresh viral moments — like when he tussled last year with heckling Republicans and chided them for past efforts to cut Medicare and Social Security.

As Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, decked out in pro-Trump paraphernalia, continued to shout at Biden, the president held up a white button that the Georgia Republican had handed him earlier bearing the name of Laken Riley, who authorities say was killed by a Venezuelan national who unlawfully crossed into the U.S. in September 2022.

One of first lady Jill Biden’s guests for the speech was Kate Cox, who sued Texas, and ultimately left her home state, to obtain an emergency abortion after a severe fetal anomaly was detected.


The original article contains 1,750 words, the summary contains 264 words. Saved 85%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2024
430 points (96.1% liked)

politics

19104 readers
1990 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS