623
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Doesnotexist@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

In my dreams, we have a flat tax of 30% over all income beyond 40k per year.

And wouldn’t it be neat if, on the tax return form, there was question:

Where would you like your tax dollars to go: • education • military • foreign aid • welfare programs • don’t care, equally distributed

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

This only would help if they would actually pay taxes at all.

[-] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

The trick is what to tax when the ultra wealthy base most of their worth on stock.

[-] Good_morning@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 8 months ago

Yah I don't remember the exact steps, but it involves getting loans with the stocks as collateral to avoid showing an income

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

With no due respect to these whiny fucking billionaires, good and go fuck yourselves for being petulant children.

[-] Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

For any who things the US ha a progressive tax system. It is ever so carefully regressive.

https://youtu.be/kXCGbAv8YPw

[-] ohlaph@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

A few verses the masses. They can suck it up, pull themselves up by their bootstraps, etc.

[-] half_built_pyramids@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

“My kids, who are 10, 12 and 14, you could tell them, ‘You know what, when you retire you’re gonna get money at 70, not 65.’” he said. “Do you think they’re gonna care?”

[-] KimjongTOOILL@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago
[-] meliodas_100@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 8 months ago

Can someone please inform me what is going on ?

[-] C126@sh.itjust.works -1 points 8 months ago

It's the first step in a wealth tax. In the future a government "wealth assessor" will inventory everything you own or invest in, make an arbitrary determination of how much its "worth", and then set your taxes. Like property tax but a million times more complex and arbitrary.

[-] thesporkeffect@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Where are you seeing this?

[-] C126@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 months ago

Literally the first paragraph of OPs article: "The plan would impose a 25 percent minimum income tax on anyone worth at least $100 million." I.e. if your asset size is less than a certain threshold it won't affect you. So it will require audits of asset size to accurately tax.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2024
623 points (97.0% liked)

politics

19126 readers
1301 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS