96
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 31 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

We all thought Trump‘s criminal trials or knocking off him the ballot would be the answer to prevent all of this, but in a little over four days, the State of New York might force him into bankruptcy. It will be very interesting to see the effects of that on his campaign and future chances to be president.

[-] Carmakazi@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

I could see an armed sit-in in response to a Trump property being seized by the courts, a la Bundy Ranch. They've already been spinning this case as baseless partisan suppression of Trump and we know they will stoop to violence if things don't go their way.

[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I can’t think of anything that would make the NYPD happier. Unlike the Capital Police in DC or the well-trained and restrained National Guard, the NYPD is the size of other countries’ armies and just as well equipped. If those MAGA crazies try that shit in New York City, they won’t know what fucking hit them.

Although, to be realistic, almost every Trump protest in NYC has amounted to no more than a dozen or so goofballs showing up and just walking around, aimlessly. and then the hundred or so looky-loos and press people show up to laugh at them.

[-] Witchfire@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

~~Some~~ Most of those that work forces

[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago
[-] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.ca 2 points 8 months ago

Cops don't like to put the boot in nearly as hard with right wing civil unrest. They know their friends are in the crowd.

[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 3 points 8 months ago
[-] GrymEdm@lemmy.world 22 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

My takeaway from the the article is basically:

  • Trump says he will do terrible things, and then plays it off like a joke when confronted.
  • Those who have worked with Trump say he almost certainly will try those terrible things.
  • It's more likely than not that the changes Trump wants would take more than 4 years to accomplish if they are allowed at all, so Trump is more likely to be useless than dangerous.

Here's hoping in 2028 the bar is higher for serious candidates than "The candidate probably won't be allowed to be as terrible as they say they'll be."

~~Edit: Would anyone be willing to tell me how to get a full line of space in between the end of a bulleted list and a new paragraph (which I'm missing in this post)? I spent some time looking and tried double space, double enter, , etc and nothing I looked up worked. Thanks in advance for saving me from my own ignorance.~~ Thank you Lemmy folks for your help!

[-] foggy@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago

The 4 years part ... This is why I kinda have faith in America.

Our process is so fucking slow and obnoxious through bureaucracy that even a relative bull in a china shop can't fully dismantle the shop.

[-] Dragomus@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

The thing is, the common thought Trump will abide by bureaucratic processes is utterly wrong. He and his cronies even made abundantly clear they will replace any opposition starting day one, and declared they have 50.000 people chosen and lined up to fill the newly empty government positions. They have no intention wait out approvals or discussions about new laws or rules.

He'll sign an executive order making instant sacking of any bureaucrat possible, those that try to block or slow him down will be forcibly removed.

As I keep bringing up, Hitler did not come into full power over years, no it took mere months and a healthy week of literally murdering all of his then political opposition to do it. Then all that came from Hitler was a denial along "I do not believe my people did this" and the whole country's government and judicial system was too afraid to not crown him Supreme leader.

The Trump camp is following the exact same roadmap... including Trump declaring his current "Jan 6th hostages" to be innocent of all crimes.

So please do not underestimate his threats or think he'll need far more than 4 years to accomplish this, as soon as he able to claim the election in his favor (because hey, the republicans are going to refuse to certify any other outcomes, unlike previously in 2020) he will be beyond existing laws and judges. And apparently it will be all legal because it is the certification that matters, not the amount of votes.

And the very minute he gets an actual armed force to occupy the congress or white house, "as a defensive measure", well good luck getting him out and undoing whatever laws/decrees he started writing.

[-] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 7 points 8 months ago

Even if he fails completely he will still do untold damage, just like he did the first time round. Putin's aim is not to control the US. Even he knows he can't do that. He wants too weaken the US by sowing chaos and in that he's already been successful beyond belief.

[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 6 points 8 months ago

Whether or not you get a full line break between the end of a list and the start of the next paragraph is up to the markdown renderer being used. Some mobile apps will show a full line between a list and a paragraph.

[-] GrymEdm@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Thank you for letting me know, appreciate it :)

[-] blurg@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Here's a non-recommended, non-standard, bad practice work-around:

  • After a bullet list,
  • put a hash tag ("#", the code for header) on its own line.

This looks somewhat like a blank line in a browser, but who knows what'll happen in other apps. (Click the "view source" icon for this example.)

[-] GrymEdm@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

At least on my Firefox browser that worked. You rock!

[-] Grunt4019@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago
  • It's more likely than not that the changes Trump wants would take more than 4 years to accomplish if they are allowed at all, so Trump is more likely to be useless than dangerous.

Check out project 2025, seems very dangerous to me: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/conservatives-aim-to-restructure-u-s-government-and-replace-it-with-trumps-vision

[-] kromem@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago
  • It's more likely than not that the changes Trump wants would take more than 4 years to accomplish if they are allowed at all, so Trump is more likely to be useless than dangerous.

Ah yes, because last time he definitely left after the four years were up without any dangerous issues.

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 18 points 8 months ago

"You are our shame."

[-] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

I am your fascism

this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2024
96 points (92.1% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2105 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS