101

Twitter applies temporary reading limits for all users, Elon Musk announces (ground.news)

submitted 1 year ago by YellowtoOrange@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

16 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 12 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] curryandbeans@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

Remember when everyone thought elon was smart

[-] assassinatedbyCIA@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

He could have just shut up and he would have continued to be seen as the cool rocket and electric car guy. But no. He’s and idiot that too self absorbed with the hot air that comes out of his mouth to know when not to speak.

[-] TVPaulD@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

The fun thing with Musk is it’s now impossible to determine whether he’s lying, doing something stupid, or simply inaccurately reporting something someone who actually knows what they’re talking about told him.

This isn’t how you handle automated processes scraping you, you handle that by restricting things that human beings can’t do. Preventing literally every user from seeing a reasonable amount of content is just cutting off your nose to spite your face. And it’s an ad-supported service. If nobody’s able to view content, they’re also not viewing ads.

With this move, he has truly achieved fractal wrongness.

[-] anlumo@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

First off, Musk fired the PR department, so there’s no way to get his side of the discussion.

I personally think that there’s something else going on and the scraping is just the front to push this through. Maybe he wants the death of Twitter look natural, which wouldn’t be the case if he just shut it down.

[-] empireOfLove@lemmy.one 23 points 1 year ago

Hmm yes let's add limits because... users are on our site too much?!

Elon is just flailing wildly at this point

[-] CookieJarObserver@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 year ago

Why do nowadays tech people make decisions worse than the fucking Metaverse?

[-] lightsecond@programming.dev 15 points 1 year ago

Maybe failing upwards was a zero interest rate phenomenon.

[-] Almonds@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

https://www.wired.com/story/tiktok-platforms-cory-doctorow/

This is a pretty good write-up of the social media cycle. Short version is at first a new platform gains value from having more users so they focus on improving it for the users. Once they have a large enough user base, they phase into focusing on advertising and how to monetize off their users. Last stage is the company is large enough and their focus is on their shareholders now.

Makes sense to me, updates at first to a platform improve it. Then later updates add more ads. Then the platform gets manipulated to maximize monetization.

[-] lightsecond@programming.dev 7 points 1 year ago

640 tweets ought to be enough for anybody.

[-] Nomecks@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Twitter is broke. Look at all the other twch companies going bust without their owners actively sabotaging them. Elon can't afford to pay his cloud bill. I bet Elon has no liquidity and can't afford to put out the dumpster fire he started.

[-] xc2215x@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

A decision from Elon that is not a good one.

load more comments

this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2023

101 points (84.4% liked)

World News

38553 readers

2651 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.