5
submitted 1 year ago by Atemu@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.ml
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] JCreazy@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago

Why is the FCC asking this question instead of already correcting the issue?

[-] astrsk@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Because fuck you, pay me, that’s why.

— Comcast, probably.

[-] dingus@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It will always make me happy that no matter how hard they try to make Xfinity happen, everyone remembers their real, ugly face before the facelift, and that ugly face is Comcast.^1

"Stop trying to make ~~fetch~~ Xfinity happen! It's not going to happen!"

[-] Kerred@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Hey Comcast's service improved in my area once google Fiber got installed.

Just goes to show you that companies are fine with you complaining as much as you want, just NEVER let there be an alternative.

[-] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Because of corporate greed and a ridiculous lack of meaningful regulation.

[-] gmg@beehaw.org 0 points 1 year ago

Lack of healthy competition. It's plain to see from the other side of the ocean where I live... Is it maybe one of those things you can only see from afar?

[-] argv_minus_one@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

Nah, we see it too. Those of us whose eyes are open, anyway.

[-] Schwarz@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

It's ridiculous I have to pay Xfinity $110/mo for my speed and unlimited bandwidth

[-] 0xD@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

God damn. In Austria I'm paying 35€ for 250/250, and am still looking over to the Romanians with longing eyes. Data caps are only on mobile - which is still questionable in my eyes.

[-] pingveno@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

Data caps on mobile makes more sense to me, simply because mobile data is so much more expensive.

[-] fraenki@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

Is it?

To me it seems it's cheaper to build an antenna to serve 100-1000s of users than to dig and install cables to all of them.

[-] pingveno@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It depends on what you're trying to do. If you're just trying to reach them and don't care about bandwidth, wireless is the way to go. It's why more developed countries lagged behind developing countries on the transition to wireless phones. But when you're trying to deploy shear amounts of bandwidth, nothing beats fiber. It's incredibly fast, has low latency, and doesn't get interference.

And I suppose I should say that I think unlimited is a bad idea in general. I favor paying for what I use. People who use expensive infrastructure sparingly should pay less than people use it a lot.

[-] BluePhoenix01@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

Over here, I'm getting the Cox... last bill was $99 a month, now my "promo period" expired, and it is the full $170 a month thanks to "unlimited". It's pretty gross, but it is the only plan that gives the "amazing" 30 mbps up. :|

[-] 0jcis@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That’s crazy! I’m paying 18 EUR a month for unlimited 1000 mbps download and 1000 mbps upload and I thought my bill was high. 😲

Oh. You were talking about mobile data. That’s still extremely expensive.

[-] BluePhoenix01@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Sadly, I’m not talking about mobile data. This is coax modem landline internet… for that price… they only get away with it because I don’t have a choice, and I need it to be able to work.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2023
5 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

34745 readers
205 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS