37

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/12864190

‘Poison portal’: US and UK could send nuclear waste to Australia under Aukus, inquiry told

Labor describes claims as ‘fear-mongering’ and says government would not accept waste from other nations

Archived version: https://archive.ph/OKW8S

all 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Geobloke@lemm.ee 10 points 7 months ago

Honestly I'm fine with this. We have so many old mines in a completely tectonically stable environment away from the water table as well as a few remote locations to serve as ports. They just better pay us

[-] Lintson@aussie.zone 2 points 7 months ago

Safe bet they will not use any of the old mines or remote ports you mention because $$$

[-] Xia@jlai.lu 3 points 7 months ago

A good thing you scrap the French deal my dear aussies

[-] Dippy@beehaw.org 1 points 7 months ago

It's important to note that nuclear doesn't have much waste. All of the United States nuclear waste could be placed on a football field and only be 10ft high

[-] sillinesslemon@aussie.zone 2 points 7 months ago
[-] Dippy@beehaw.org 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Feet. Or approximately 3 meters

[-] anathema_device@bne.social 2 points 7 months ago

@Dippy @sillinesslemon 10ft is more like 3 metres.

A football field is 300ft x 160ft. So using your estimate, that's 480,000 cubic feet, or 13,592 cubic metres of radioactive waste

[-] Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone 1 points 7 months ago

Dave Sweeny should be made to work in a coal plant or mine for the rest of his life

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 1 points 7 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Australia could become a “poison portal” for international radioactive waste under the Aukus deal, a parliamentary inquiry into nuclear safety legislation has heard.

Dave Sweeney, the Australian Conservation Foundation’s nuclear free campaigner, said the issue of waste disposal was “highly disturbing” and that the Aukus partners could see Australia as a “a little bit of a radioactive terra nullius”.

The defence minister, Richard Marles, has previously accused the Greens of “fearmongering” when they raised similar concerns, saying the government would not accept waste from the other nations.

“You can go on Google Maps and look at them rusting away in real time, can’t you?” Shoebridge asked Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency (Arpansa) chief regulatory officer, James Scott.

Robin Townsend, an engineer and fellow at the UK-based Royal Institution of Naval Architects, told the inquiry that there was “a very big mountain to climb” to safely store nuclear waste, with the technology “still in its infancy”.

The defence department said the bill would provide “a regulatory framework able to accommodate any future government decisions regarding the management of radioactive waste”.


The original article contains 754 words, the summary contains 181 words. Saved 76%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2024
37 points (95.1% liked)

Australia

3579 readers
48 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS