308
submitted 7 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 71 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

To the "lets not vote" crowd because Biden didn't do something or other, this will be your congratulations.

[-] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 43 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I'm sure the Gazans will be thrilled with that crowd's upstanding moral conviction as Donnie quintuples the drone count

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 29 points 7 months ago

"Finish the job" or whatever the specific wording that Trump used sounds far worse than that.

[-] Seraph@kbin.social 5 points 7 months ago

"Mission Accomplished"

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago

If they're still around by next January, you mean.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 12 points 7 months ago

There won't be a Gaza to level by the time the next term starts. "Uninstructed" and similar campaigns are trying to get Biden to influence his policies now, not make a statement about which man will be better in the next genocide.

[-] Astrealix@lemmy.world 14 points 7 months ago

There's been a Gaza for decades, it's not going to stop just because the genocidal Bibi tries to, even if it is being turned into rubble. The primary uncommited campaign is good, and I support it, but people saying that they're gonna vote for Trump over Biden / that they'll abstain entirely are just not going to help either present or future atrocities — wiping your hand clean doesn't save lives.

[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 11 points 7 months ago

Saying they won't vote for Biden is the only leverage they have to exercise to prompt policy changes. "Uncommitted" scoring big in Michigan was effectively the first time Biden even started to pay attention to anti-genocide voters. Again, the goal is to make Biden change his stance so that he wins the election. Threatening his election is the leverage, not the end goal.

[-] Astrealix@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago

Yes, but it only works so much as that leverage exists. When the alternative is Trump, that leverage isn't gonna be realistically useable come November — and there are definitely folks who don't just say they won't vote for Biden over this issue (which is imo good, since that's the whole point of a democracy). I just worry that this strategy actually does extend to the general election and make even more people suffer even more... IMO, focus should be on bottom up — specifically the legislative branch, where there's quite a few especially in the House where a primary campaign could do well and force the issue at hand.

[-] hglman@lemmy.ml 5 points 7 months ago

Trump is an enormous amount of leverage. Biden basically has to adapt if he cares about stopping Trump.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Astrealix@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

At the end of the day though we just have to see whether current strategy works out come election day, I feel. Or if/when, God willing, a peace is attained.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

Trying to make this an election issue is moronic. Neither side is with Gaza, making his a moot point. Not to mention this is an election for the American presidency, not for president of Earth and Gaza. Deal with this outside of the election, through Congress and the Senate, but to make this an election issue only helps Trump and will hurt Gaza in the long run

[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 3 points 6 months ago

Ah, the genocide-apologia account pops in with the clarion call of "protest some other time in some other place in a way that doesn't impact the target of your protest". And we've all seen your posts. We know sure as shit you don't give a fuck about "helping Gaza in the long run".

This isn't an election issue, this is a "right now" issue with a warning for danger in the election if he continues. Biden not changing his tack is what helps Trump. He's the active party in all this. The campaign didn't "make it an election issue", they're just trying to make him recognize it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 49 points 7 months ago

A former aide to President Donald Trump and current co-host of ABC's The View

What a dystopian fucking sentence!

[-] PsychedSy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 7 months ago

At least it's not another lobbyist or oil/finance company board member.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 21 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

True, just a professional fascist swamp dweller for the last decade plus change:

Before 2014, Griffin wrote articles for her father's far-right website WorldNetDaily, where she served as a "special Washington correspondent for WND."[7][6] In 2010, Griffin was a media intern for Congressman Tom McClintock and began a one-year position as an associate producer on The Laura Ingraham Show.[11] In the 2012 Presidential election cycle, Griffin was the spokesperson for the College Republican National Committee, traveling the country discussing the youth vote. In 2014, she was named Press Secretary for Congressman Mark Meadows; she was later named as his Communications Director. She went on to work as the Communications Director for the Freedom Caucus in the U.S. House of Representatives, serving under Jim Jordan and Mark Meadows.[12]

[-] PsychedSy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 7 months ago

Ignore the trump shit. They hired someone that worked for WorldNutDaily?

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

Yeah, the whole false equivalence appearance of neutrality bullshit they have going forces them to REALLY scrape the bottom of the barrel sometimes..

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

wrote articles for her father's far-right website

Now we have nepo-fascists to worry about too? Damnit.

[-] SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social 23 points 7 months ago

Good news, everybody! It's already mostly leveled, so the odds of there being anything left by next January are slim.

[-] BruceTwarzen@kbin.social 22 points 7 months ago

He's fat, but he's not that fat.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 15 points 7 months ago

to be fair.... he does everything without a thought.

He's incapable of thought. somebody should stuff him in a dark lab and do some psychatric tests for.... I dunno... the next decade?

This really shouldn't be surprising. The man has signalled and announced his desire to shoot first and ask questions later at the slightest provocation. He's also very vocally pro-Israel. Anybody crowing about "Genocide Joe" is a bad actor intentionally trying to confuse the discourse with bullshit noise. There is no ethical vote except for Biden. Every single US president has been pro-Israel, so just drop that argument and start focussing on how to materially improve living conditions of actual Americans.

[-] soratoyuki@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago

Broke: People being opposed to the ongoing genocide in Gaza are going to get Trump elected.

Woke: Biden's uncritical support of an unpopular genocide in Gaza is going to get Trump elected.

Biden could just, you know, stop giving arms to Israel.

[-] crusa187@lemmy.ml 7 points 6 months ago

Stop sending them bombs right now, and withhold money until they can prove they’ve stopped murdering civilians. This is an easy solution, it’s such a low bar, yet Biden is unable to clear it.

[-] in4aPenny@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

If I were to turn on my Machiavellian reptile brain and looked at this situation (from what I've read) as if this was a game or something...

Israel is kinda like The West's attack/guard dog in the Middle East. That dog is getting out of control. The only leash that The West has on Israel is their funding, remove the funding and they remove the leash, and now we've got an out of control dog with nukes and no leash. It may not seem like the leash isn't doing much to control it but it's far better than letting the dog loose. Especially considering how powerful the dog is, how it seems to have more control over The West than the other way around, might have to do with all the religious leadership on both sides looking forward to the red cow they're sacrificing this month, maybe their prophecy of a "second coming" and (nuclear) fire raining from the sky to end humanity is kinda the point.

I'm going to stop the reptile brain before it mentions how we typically deal with bad dogs that can't be tamed, because god forbid THAT'S taking things too far.

[-] zerog_bandit@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

All you "genocide" claimers are gonna get the orange man elected.

[-] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 20 points 6 months ago

Can we be at least a little nicer about the point you're making? Poor form to assume bad faith when anyone with a heart wants Biden doing more. The problem is that Israel is deliberately forcing Biden to eat shit on this issue because guess what, Bibi has every reason to prefer Trump in 2024.

[-] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 16 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

That dude, zerog_bandit, has repeatedly done genocide denial and justification.

I think most US voters on here know that Trump will be significantly worse than Biden on Israel. Both candidates are pro-genocide, but at least Biden and Dems can be pressured to change. Not to mention that Trump wants to ramp up domestic fascism too.

[-] Oderus@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

No shit. This is not a 'both sides' issue. So annoyed with that weak-assed mentality.

[-] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

I agree, it's a cop-out to ignore the actual issues and solutions.

[-] lennybird@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Unfortunately there are more nefarious forces that intend to sow defeatism and apathy. I had one such buffoon tell me they're voting 3rd party. Don't fall for this garbage.

[-] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

I would vote third party in every election

IF WE HAD STAR VOTING

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

I'm sorry for feeling bad that children are dying. I'll do my best to be a good American and support the people killing them.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Drusas@kbin.social 5 points 7 months ago

Given the way it is portrayed on the news, I thought it already was practically leveled. Or does this mean extra leveled? Like salt the earth.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2024
308 points (94.8% liked)

politics

19132 readers
4341 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS