62
submitted 7 months ago by ZippyBot@lemmy.zip to c/gaming@lemmy.zip
top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Technus@lemmy.zip 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Unfortunately I have a strong feeling that courts and regulators are gonna go, "not our problem, vote with your wallet."

You could make the argument that the consumer can't make an informed decision about purchasing a product if they have no idea how long the publisher intends to keep it functional. But at the most I only see this leading to some fine print on the box/site saying "publisher only guarantees game services will remain available through <arbitrary date 2-3 years in the future>." Better than nothing, sure, but it'd still be on the consumer to pay attention to that.

Edit: forgot a word

[-] tiredcapillary@iusearchlinux.fyi 1 points 7 months ago

I have this feeling too. But any game that requires an internet connection to work will eventually end up being bricked when its servers are shut down.

I recently played Helldiver's 1 on the PS vita, and realized the servers were disabled. despite those servers being down you could still essentially play the game, even though its not as fun.

this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2024
62 points (98.4% liked)

Gaming

2482 readers
368 users here now

The Lemmy.zip Gaming Community

For news, discussions and memes!


Community Rules

This community follows the Lemmy.zip Instance rules, with the inclusion of the following rule:

You can see Lemmy.zip's rules by going to our Code of Conduct.

What to Expect in Our Code of Conduct:


If you enjoy reading legal stuff, you can check it all out at legal.lemmy.zip.


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS