97
submitted 7 months ago by lautan@lemmy.ca to c/opensource@lemmy.ml

Sustainable open source will stay a dream

(page 2) 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Mikina@programming.dev 4 points 7 months ago

I wonder, is it possible to create a license that would allow you to simply ban people who are being a dick about something from using it? Sure, it may turn away some people, since there's always a risk of abuse, but it's your work and as far as I know, you are the one who sets the terms.

If I'm not mistaken, most of the FOSS licenses (or maybe even laws?) guarantee you that you would be able to use the software even if the project later decides to change to proprietary license. But I assume you can simply specify in a licence "Everyone can use it, expect X.Y.Z".

Would that be legal? Sure, it would probably be pretty hard to enforce, but in some cases it could make for a pretty satisfactory (and petty, of course) C&D letters, for people that really deserve it. You insult the devs of a software your company depends on, demanding something while being a dick about it? Well, fuck you, no library for you and your company.

[-] megaman@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 7 months ago

There is a paint pigment that is available for sale but you have to confirm that you are not Anish Kapoor (another artist) and that you will let Kapoor get his hands on the pigment.

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/artist-only-person-banned-using-worlds-pinkest-pink-180961464/

[-] jkrtn@lemmy.ml 2 points 7 months ago

You can certainly make such a license but I think it will hinder adoption. Just do a paid license at that point and refuse to renew if someone makes you mad enough.

[-] Mikina@programming.dev 1 points 7 months ago

But a paid licence will affect users that are all right abd for whom you're doing it.

I understand that using something with a risk of loosong access because you've upset the developer is something that will turn away a lot of people, but then again, I'd say that "don't be a dick" is a pretty reasonable requirement. The only issue I see that it's a pretty vague definiton, but maybe just limiting it to profanities and insult towards the contributors is something more concrete, which would be easy to fulfill and also enforce.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] bmcgonag@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

Hate to see this, but there are definitely people who are takers and have the nerve to be entitled at the same time.

  1. You, as an open source maintainer owe nothing to anyone. Never feel compelled to do anything in your project that doesn’t make you happy.
  2. you should 100% be able to charge for your work. I applaud you for that.
  3. There are more of us out here who want to support open source int he right way. Know that.
  4. thank you for the project you made and shared. Truly.
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2024
97 points (76.5% liked)

Open Source

31358 readers
49 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS