61
submitted 7 months ago by MasterPain@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world
all 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 19 points 7 months ago

My bank, they had the Oracle experts to take care of the Data center and they experienced a whole week of downtime. In 2024, a week of downtime for a bank. Imagine the cost of that.

Don't understand the companies that they're intentionally going with Oracle

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 9 points 7 months ago

Lowest bidder and/or the exec got wined and dined.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

Its always the case. Always.

[-] Shiggles@sh.itjust.works 6 points 7 months ago

One would almost suggest making it easier to commit fraud is a feature, not a bug.

[-] EdanGrey@sh.itjust.works 7 points 7 months ago

As an auditor myself, this is ridiculous. This is what happens when you don't properly involve auditors in software.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 5 points 7 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Birmingham City Council, Europe's biggest local authority, has no way of knowing if financial fraud has been committed after it failed to run security and audit features in a new Oracle Fusion ERP system.

The English council, which was responsible for £3.7 billion revenue [PDF] in 2021, also continues to struggle with "segregation of duties" features that set who is legally allowed to see and control transactions, essential for preventing fraud.

Fiona Greenway, director of finance and statutory officer, told the Audit Committee yesterday that the council would almost certainly never know if fraud had been committed.

The cost of implementing a functioning system that allows external auditors to sign off accounts is expected to be more than £100 million more than initial estimates.

In October last year, a 12-page public interest report from external auditors Grant Thornton highlighted concerns over security and governance from when the system was first introduced.

Earlier this month, Councillor Fred Grindrod, chair of the council's audit committee, asked why the Oracle system was still not "safe and compliant" in terms of legal and statutory obligations going into the new financial year, something Grant Thornton said would be "absolutely crucial."


The original article contains 516 words, the summary contains 195 words. Saved 62%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] Railison@aussie.zone 5 points 7 months ago

So is this Oracle’s fault for over promising, council’s fault for not communicating its needs, or a lack of training/induction?

[-] assembly@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

My guess is that Oracle has audit logging support but it was not turned on by the implementation vendor. Typically a customer uses a partner for professional services to get it up and running for training and handoff. So it’s probably a mix of people that kicked it up. The one constant with Oracle deployments is that they are always over budget and rarely work and it’s somehow always a mix of faults. So from a high level view it is probably something to do with the way Oracle engages or who they partner with or both.

[-] fluxion@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

They literally went bankrupt spending $166 million (600% over budget) on a financial auditing system... and it can't be audited. What a dumpster fire.

this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2024
61 points (93.0% liked)

World News

39153 readers
2249 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS