Privacy is Pro-National Security w/ J.W. Verret (MT 310) (monero.town)

submitted 6 months ago by monerotalk@monero.town to c/monero@monero.town

2 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Privacy is Pro-National Security w/ J.W. Verret (MT 310)

TODAY'S 🎙SHOW:Douglas Tuman interviews J.W. Verret, a practicing lawyer and law professor at George Mason University.

J.W. discusses his role as an expert witness in the Roman Sterlingov trial, where he argued that Sterlingov could not have allegedly ran Bitcoin Fog. J.W. and Doug also talk about the implications of the government's recent overreach related to privacy and cryptocurrency technology by exploring the indictments against Tornado Cash and Samurai Wallet.

Hear about who in the US Congress are allies in the movement to normalize privacy and the potential hope Monero provides to resist increasing government infringement on privacy.

Watch Here (YouTube) ➡️ https://youtu.be/ZLJMyQ9dcOI Watch Here (Odysee) ➡️ https://odysee.com/@MoneroTalk:8/privacy-is-pro-national-security-w-j.w.:e Listen Here 🎧: https://www.monerotalk.live/privacy-is-pro-national-security-j-w-verret-310

Coffee & Monero, Go to Gratuitas.org today!

Monerotopia23 confer vids: monerotopia.com/videos

Thank you to sponsors, u/cakelabs and u/Stealthex_io as well as u/sunchakr for making these interviews possible! And of course our listeners and supporters for making Monero Talk possible!

Podcasts 🎧 :

iTunes: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/monero-talk/id1445930212 Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/60lQ05X8lcuXv71fhi6hl7?si=SL2rlvDPS0q68169NlCrtQ

If you enjoy our show please Subscribe, Like, Share, Rate our YouTube Channel & Podcasts. This will help us grow and spread Monero content!

top 2 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] mister_monster@monero.town 2 points 6 months ago

It's pro national security, not pro state security. It's important to make the distinction, think of guns and the second amendment to the US constitution. Very much secures the territory, population, national culture etc, but weakens state control. Why?

It's because the state does not operate representative of any group. No state can do that. It simply has one special population from which it derives it's resources, and then a bunch of other populations and actors, and it has to contend with those two sets differently. It has to operate as if you are a potential enemy. Often, this means managing you like you are already an enemy. It treats the other set similarly, except it has to manage it differently. To a state, you aren't the special thing it exists to protect, you are a caveat with how it contends with all entities that are potential enemies. It has to protect you to ensure it's continued survival, but that's not all it takes, you may threaten it's survival, and in that case, you are it's enemy.