40
submitted 6 months ago by funn@lemy.lol to c/technology@beehaw.org

cross-posted from: https://lemy.lol/post/25062075

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Hirom@beehaw.org 27 points 6 months ago

Many of these are Google Play Services features, so it won't be available to users open-source Android flavors that are google-free.

[-] GingeyBook@lemm.ee 13 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Which is a fraction of a fraction of Android users.

I'm all for de Googling if that's what tickles your fancy, but ask anyone on the street and they'll have no idea what you're talking about

Edit: This also allows Google to push some of these features to older devices which may not ever see another system update

[-] Hirom@beehaw.org 3 points 6 months ago

In that blog post, google does not commit to open sourcing these play services features, to integrate in future system upgrade.

I would love to be proven wrong.

[-] FalseMyrmidon@kbin.run 6 points 6 months ago

Yep, no one claimed otherwise.

[-] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

While I agree with you, the first step for user centric Android flavors regarding security is to support relocking the bootloader, with a custom (preferably the user's own) digital signature. As long as we dont have that, an attacker could flash or just boot a custom bootloader through fastboot that does its own thing.

However that doesn't really depend on Android system developers, I think, as the problem arises from the inferiority of almost every phone's bootloader (chain) (because most phones does not support setting up a custom signature for bootloader verification), and probably that can only be reasonably solved by device manufacturers, because as I understand, bootloaders do a lot of heavily device specific things, so there cant really be a common (primary) bootloader, and making one for each phone is a lot of work that also involves lots of reverse engineering, and maybe the early bootloaders cant even be overwritten on some phones..

[-] jarfil@beehaw.org 2 points 6 months ago

It's kind of both Google's and manufacturers responsibility. Google has made available a Dynamic System Updates feature:

https://source.android.com/docs/core/ota/dynamic-system-updates

https://developer.android.com/topic/dsu

...but it requires manufacturer support to allow adding custom keys.

[-] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 2 points 6 months ago

Hmm, this is interesting, it looks like if it was a multiboot solution

[-] BlastboomStrice@mander.xyz 3 points 6 months ago

Lol, who wants these anyways. One more reason not to use google play services. (Though I have google play services on this phone.)

Automatic AI-powered screen lock for when your phone is snatched.

Theft Detection Lock is a powerful new feature that uses Google AI to sense if someone snatches your phone from your hand and tries to run, bike or drive away. If a common motion associated with theft is detected, your phone screen quickly locks – which helps keep thieves from easily accessing your data.

One good thing you could try is use this app:

Find My Device

[-] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 2 points 6 months ago

Theft Detection Lock is a powerful new feature that uses Google AI to sense if someone snatches your phone from your hand and tries to run, bike or drive away. If a common motion associated with theft is detected, your phone screen quickly locks – which helps keep thieves from easily accessing your data.

Why would we need AI for that? That just makes the function unpredictable. There must be a real solution to detecting this.

[-] jarfil@beehaw.org 1 points 6 months ago

The real solution is, a heuristic analysis of the phone's gyroscope and accelerometer data.

Marketing calls that, "AI".

[-] TehPers@beehaw.org 2 points 6 months ago

Not just marketing, that's the term it's always been called. Plug a bunch of parameters into a non-deterministic model and you've got an AI, at least by what seems to be the common definition of the term.

[-] jarfil@beehaw.org 1 points 6 months ago

"AI" used to mean "whatever we don't fully understand yet". A lot of processes have walked the path from "fantasy" to "AI" to "algorithm". Doesn't need to be non-deterministic, the original tic-tac-toe playing software was "AI" at the time.

Until we get some AGI, the term "AI" will remain a moving technological target, and a static marketing target.

[-] funn@lemy.lol 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

That's my concern too. They should have baked those into AOSP making it available for all ROMS.

[-] jarfil@beehaw.org 1 points 6 months ago

It isn't clear which of these features use Google servers and which ones don't. The "Find My Device" definitely does, and has no place in AOSP. If they're actually using AI to compare phone state with some tracked "habitual" behavior, it may also have no place in AOSP, but who knows.

[-] GlassHalfHopeful@lemmy.ca 4 points 6 months ago

Trunk Monkey Mobile would have been better. 🐒

this post was submitted on 16 May 2024
40 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37720 readers
511 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS