204
but but... i thought the president has 100% total immunity even when ordering the assassination of a political rival !?
/s
It would be legal. And viable.
And it's how he envisions solving the problem of a viable contender.
But but…. I thought Biden is suffering from some mental decay and is incapable of thinking.
The same way that they say: migrant workers are lazy welfare queens who are simultaneously taking all our jobs.
Just signaling his own intentions if given the chance.
Yeah, when they wouldn’t even enter a closet locked with a bathroom knob. Total assault, massively violent “raid”.
They intentionally planned it for when he was not even in the state.
I'm no assassin, but I am pretty sure if you are gunning for somebody, you don't make sure the target is somewhere else where there is zero possibility of them showing up while you are there.
Another case of Democrats not taking action when they had the opportunity.
Lmao
Every accusation is a confession.
That's the Republican way.
According to Trump's lawyers arguments on immunity, Biden would be within his rights to assassinate him
So then it is suffice to say Trump has floated the idea of offing our current President. I am so sick of even hearing his stupid name at this point.
Trump has already said that Biden should get the electric chair. How that doesn't count as a threat, idfk.
I wish Biden were that cool.
Oh, is that a problem now?
You mean like every cop going to a mental health call? This is a world you helped build.
The Biden that Trump and Right Wingers make up sounds like the guy I actually want to be President.
Mango Mussolini should have locked and loaded during the Vietnam War, but the shitbag chickened out.
A sitting president was trying to kill me, so I'm pushing the idea that any president can legally have political opponents killed
-DJT; ART OF THE DEAL
If only.
It's not that he "falsely said" something. It doesn't even matter whether it's true or false and it's stupid to spend time debating whether he was right or wrong to say what he said. What he did by saying that was to give a rallying cry to whip up the fury of people who already believe in him. It doesn't matter if it's real, it just matters that they stay angry.
Its a shame they didn't
this post was submitted on 22 May 2024
204 points (94.7% liked)
politics
19135 readers
1092 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS