29
submitted 5 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

"Confederate Army Lt. Col. William F. Beasley gifted the county the monument in 1902."

Barely 100 years old? Fuck it, tear it down. You don't memorialize the losers in a Civil War.

[-] Neato@ttrpg.network 8 points 5 months ago

Yep. Doesn't even have historical significance. It's just another of those Jim Crow statues meant to oppress black people after slavery ended. Fucking NC.

[-] gt5@lemm.ee 5 points 5 months ago

Not surprising. Drive down 40 from Asheville towards Charlotte and you’ll see 3 or 4 huge confederate flags waving right next to the highway. There’s so many homes and vehicles waving it too all over the place. Folks are loud and proud down there, it’s gross.

[-] cordlesslamp@lemmy.today 5 points 5 months ago

Proud of what?

"We used to own slaves but now we can't and still bitter about it"?

It should be illegal to fly confederate flags in the US, like it's illegal to fly Nazi flags in Germany.

[-] Avatar_of_Self@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Ironically, those that proudly fly a traitor's flag due to their proud heritage generally also think of themselves as patriots. Just like, ironically, those that fly the Gasden flag tend to be bootlickers and also tend to be the same people.

NC is so weird. Many whites there will tell you other than 'reverse racism' that racism doesn't really exist anymore all while being explicitly racist in the next sentence.

[-] Veedem@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

It would almost be better if it’s toppled by a large crowd of people. The people who support such a thing need to see the shitstorm they would rightfully face if they ever said it too loudly.

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

If by “shitstorm,” you mean “watching all the protestors get waaaay too long prison sentences, then yes

[-] kerrigan778@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Some citizens want it gone, others can't believe it's still there at all.

[-] Gork@lemm.ee 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Meanwhile at City Hall:

I know getting funding to tear it down can be difficult but hear me out, why don't we just take out the "e" in slaves and repurpose the statue to celebrate our local Slavs by putting a track coat on it.

This would cost a lot less money to do since removing a letter is much less labor intensive than removing an entire statue.

(This is known as the Florence Y'all Approach)

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

That Wikipedia article was a great read lol

[-] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

It actually was, though. I fell down the rabbit hole awhile.

I’m not an NC resident and I want it gone. That shit is offensive on like a half dozen levels at the very least.

[-] stoy@lemmy.zip 3 points 5 months ago

I am not even a US citizen or resident, and I want it gone.

It serves only to embellish history.

[-] lightnegative@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Still kind of relevant today; benevolent big corporate appreciating the work of its faithful office slaves

/s just in case

[-] maculata@aussie.zone 1 points 5 months ago

What a foul thing to still exist in 2024. I’m sure some chains and a big truck could make short work of the removal.

Pull it out and leave in on the mayor's lawn. It'll be disposed of in no time. You know, even just deface it with a chisel.

[-] maculata@aussie.zone 1 points 5 months ago

Just topple it and make sure the lettering is smashed to fuck.

[-] AnAnonymous@lemm.ee -2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Let me guess, the faithful slaves wants the faithful slaves monument removed?

this post was submitted on 26 May 2024
29 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19089 readers
2200 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS