489
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 123 points 1 year ago

Henry Ford may have been a prick, but even he had the common sense to realize paying your workers enough to buy your products was mutually beneficial. All this wealth hoarding going on serves nobody but the ultra rich that are simply addicted to watching numbers go up.

[-] Poggervania@kbin.social 53 points 1 year ago

Which is why I’m hesitant to actually call those greedy fucks “capitalists”, because they’re the very antithesis of capitalism. They literally break the system for their own benefit, and thanks to US politicians to being corrupt enough to allow themselves to be bought out for a few bucks from said greedy fucks, nobody in power is incentivized to actually do something.

Capitalism works with money flowing constantly, and it needs that to work well. When you have some Warren Buffet and Elongated Muskrat kind of people just hoarding wealth… well, you get the shitshow that is the the US today. $300B circulating in the system would be awesome, and I would think that is a good indicator of a healthy economy; but when $300B is pretty much tied to one person, then congrats, we missed the point of capitalism.

[-] Wogi@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago

The only goal of capitalism is to raise capital. Any method that raises capital is as valid as any other. The working class people are essentially just a bank to draw capital from, nothing more. Not to them anyway.

Anything else they told you about capitalism in school was bullshit. It does one thing. Increase capital through any means.

There is a logical end point where the working class can keep no capital for themselves, and produce it until they die. And what happens when there's no more shareholder value to extract from the working class I wonder?

[-] ThatWeirdGuy1001@sh.itjust.works 30 points 1 year ago

That's why we call it "late stage" capitalism.

[-] w00tabaga@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

This comment is so good that I want to bottle it, take it home, and bathe in it

[-] TenderfootGungi@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

No. He did it because turnover was so insane it was cheaper to raise pay.

load more comments (15 replies)
[-] hogunner@lemmy.world 98 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Underpaid employees: Corporations are going to fix this problem they created by paying employees their share of record profits?

Corporations: No, not like that!

[-] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 58 points 1 year ago

Profits are unpaid wages, change my mind.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] theodewere@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

wait, you mean the Trump Tax Cuts haven't trickled down to workers? well what in the Wide Wide World of Sports is a going on here?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] gun@lemmy.ml 56 points 1 year ago

This strikes me as a "you will own nothing and be happy" solution. Instead of paying workers a fair wage so they can put something into savings for a rainy day, you will be at the mercy of your employer for support.

This seems to be the trend. In the future, you will have most of your needs at least met, but not through your own means, because you will have no means whatsoever. You will not be able to take care of yourself without your corporation parent. This is a very coercive situation.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

I'm not doing well healthwise right now and my employers told me that they were concerned about my health and I could take as many unpaid sick days as I want.

[-] sturmblast@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

America's attitude towards healthcare is completely backasswards

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Speculater@lemmy.world 47 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And those of us who have it relatively easy, have to live with the guilt of telling all our family members no all the fucking time.

load more comments (22 replies)
[-] Okay6120@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago

Please tell me the TDLR is a pizza party!

[-] affiliate@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

this would be very helpful during the times where the $500 emergency is the need for a pizza party

[-] Naja_Kaouthia@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago

Me, looking at a $500 dentist bill for a crown because teeth are luxury bones: Yeah…..fuck.

[-] IMongoose@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

I had a root canal and crown, $2k. I'm financing a tooth now.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] kautau@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The first change made it so employees may save up to $2,500 in after-tax money in a separate account alongside their retirement accounts. Workers would potentially be automatically enrolled in the programs, which would defer the money automatically through payroll deductions.

Read: banks lobby to get money automatically deposited into their specific accounts so they can generate interest from it the employees will never see, and make it more difficult for employees to actually get their money

[-] AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Ah yes, the time proven effective strategy to get the poor back on board the against-their-own-interests train:

"Unchecked Capitalism will save you from the problems that Unchecked Capitalism directly caused!" 🤣

If that sounds reasonable, here's a solution for climate change: lets double the amount of carbon shit we're pumping into the air. Fuck it, double or nothing!

[-] Strangle@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago

Fuck employers, everything is TOO FUCKING EXPENSIVE

[-] w00tabaga@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago

Wage increases are getting blown out of the water by inflation and cost of living. Everyone is really starting to feel that pinch. So naturally now is when the feds decide to unfreeze school loans. Really telling of how out of touch our government is

load more comments (12 replies)
[-] foggy@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Oh, uh, there were hurricanes.

Supply chain.

You understand.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] space@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 1 year ago

63% of workers unable to pay a $500 emergency expense, survey finds. How employers may help change that

They will make it 83%

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Chetzemoka@kbin.social 18 points 1 year ago

It's also pretty hard when the corporations you work for aren't interested in paying you what you're worth. People need and deserve better wages

[-] noride@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago

Corporations literally cannot pay you what you're worth. The very nature of capitalism requires exploitation. For capitalism to function, there must be an inequity between a worker's true value, i.e. their productive output, and their cost. The system is literally designed to fuck you over from the top down.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] TacoNissan@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 year ago

Of course I know this. It's me

[-] verdantbanana@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

people will worry so much about this but will elect the same people over and over again to lead based on shirt color just because they change the shirt to red or blue same clothing factory

maybe younger people from a new political party might be able to help or rioting in the streets or something

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Pizza party in the conference room.

[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

I'm very fortunate to finally be able to cover a major expense like that. Nothing like going to the hospital, but if I needed new tires I wouldn't be completely broke.

It's a strange feeling.

[-] Zink@programming.dev 7 points 1 year ago

narrator: They didn’t.

[-] theodewere@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Republicans in Congress: THOSE ARE ROOKIE NUMBERS!! I WANNA SEE 85-90% UP THERE LET'S GO!!

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2023
489 points (96.9% liked)

News

23406 readers
2674 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS