388
submitted 5 months ago by girlfreddy@lemmy.ca to c/news@lemmy.world

A company that breeds animals for medical testing has been fined a record $35m (£27m) after 4,000 beagles were rescued from its facility in Virginia in 2022.

The fine against Envigo RMS LLC for animal cruelty is the largest fine ever issued under the Animal Welfare Act, according to the US Department of Justice (DoJ).

“Envigo promoted a business culture that prioritized profit and convenience over following the law,” Christopher Kavanaugh, the US attorney for the Western District of Virginia, said in a statement.

“This callous approach led to dire consequences: the inhumane treatment of animals and the contamination of our waterway,” he said.

Envigo's parent company, Inotiv, has agreed to pay the record eight-figure settlement. It has also agreed to not breed dogs for the next five years.

top 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 93 points 5 months ago

Disgusting. Commercial breeding should be illegal. There are enough dogs in the world as it is and they encourage inbreeding to boot.

[-] Sizzler@slrpnk.net 24 points 5 months ago

These dogs are tortured and killed, they are bred to be tortured and killed.

[-] meliaesc@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 5 months ago

When you see products that say "not tested on animals", these are the animals that things DO get tested on, and their bodies are disposed of immediately afterwards.

[-] Dasus@lemmy.world 39 points 5 months ago

Envigo promoted a business culture that prioritized profit and convenience over following the law

Yeah that's called capitalism

[-] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

In other words, the cost of doing business

[-] AhismaMiasma@lemm.ee 36 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Massive numbers of beagles are being used for genetic testing and experimentation by the government.

Don't worry about it.

[-] BakerBagel@midwest.social 18 points 5 months ago

Also medical and pharmacuetical testing. Variety in testing models are important, which is why there are lots of regulations about how abimals bred for research are treated and handled. It's an ugly reality, but the alternative is just releasing potentially hazardous products on the population.

[-] johannesvanderwhales@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

At the end of the day I'd rather medical research be conducted on dogs than humans (at least, prior to when things are ready for human trials). But also I'm pretty sure it's regulated what can be tested on different kinds of animals. The bar for testing on rodents is for example much lower than the bar for primates.

[-] gheesh@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

Medical research? These poor creatures will end up being test subjects for cosmetics, tobacco, pollution,... You know, just so the people who pay know how much a living being (i.e. your future self) can take before collapsing. Implying most (or even a significant portion) of them are for "finding a cure for cancer" is PR washing.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Animal testing is legal, yes. This was a private company breaking the law.

The fine against Envigo RMS LLC for animal cruelty is the largest fine ever issued under the Animal Welfare Act, according to the US Department of Justice (DoJ).

“Envigo promoted a business culture that prioritized profit and convenience over following the law,” Christopher Kavanaugh, the US attorney for the Western District of Virginia, said in a statement.

[-] Atelopus-zeteki@kbin.run 4 points 5 months ago

It's the Beagle Battalion! Forget about Boston Dynamics.

[-] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 17 points 5 months ago

Fuck that company for so many reasons. Chief among them, breeding a dog that barks and howls incessantly.

[-] comador@lemmy.world 18 points 5 months ago

I trained my beagle to do neither bark nor howl, but she whined incessantly lol. Point is, any dog can be trained at any age not to, so it's the owners fault (most times as there are exceptions), not the dog's.

[-] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Yes, I'm actually mad at bad owners. Poor dogs are in the cross fire.

[-] NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth 1 points 5 months ago

Maybe but their back is like their ears, way oversized.

I think you're thinking of basset hounds. Beagles ears aren't all that big. Bigger in comparison to head size than a terrier's or a shepherd breed, but not 'trip over them' basset hound size.

[-] NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth 1 points 1 month ago

I think I was too.

I always get them confused

[-] BakerBagel@midwest.social 6 points 5 months ago

Beagles are the primary breed for any sort of medical/drug testing. I have no idea why they use beagles specifically, but it's the industry standard.

[-] anon6789@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

They're well mannered and don't take up much space is the answer in seeing in all the search results.

[-] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 17 points 5 months ago

c/upliftingnews

Each one of those beagles is worth ten of that slimeball.

Is there an animal offenders list we can add these monsters to so that they're not even allowed to pet someone else's dog for the rest of their life?

[-] bluewing@lemm.ee 4 points 5 months ago

Let me check article - Yep, the East Coast where puppy mills run rampant.

this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2024
388 points (99.0% liked)

News

23296 readers
2307 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS